mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning First-Order Symbolic Representations for Planning from the Structure of the State Space

arXiv 1909.05546 ↗First posted 12 Sep 2019cs.AIcited by 38

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

One of the main obstacles for developing flexible AI systems is the split between data-based learners and model-based solvers. Solvers such as classical planners are very flexible and can deal with a variety of problem instances and goals but require first-order symbolic models. Data-based learners, on the other hand, are robust but do not produce such representations. In this work we address this split by showing how the first-order symbolic representations that are used by planners can be learned from non-symbolic inputs that encode the structure of the state space. The representation learning problem is formulated as the problem of inferring planning instances over a common but unknown first-order domain that account for the structure of the observed state space. This means to infer a complete first-order representation (i.e. general action schemas, relational symbols, and objects) that explains the observed state space structures. The inference problem is cast as a two-level combinatorial search where the outer level searches for values of a small set of hyperparameters and the inner level, solved via SAT, searches for a first-order symbolic model. The framework is shown to produce general and correct first-order representations for standard problems like Gripper, Blocksworld, and Hanoi from input graphs that encode the flat state-space structure of a single instance.

Key facts. Cited by 38 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 12 Sep 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 8; 2022: 8; 2023: 6; 2024: 4; 2025: 5; 2026: 7.

38 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021Towards Causal Representation Learningcited by 207
  2. 2023Leveraging Pre-trained Large Language Models to Construct and Utilize World Models for Model-based Task Planningcited by 204
  3. 2022Predicate Invention for Bilevel Planningcited by 49
  4. 2021Learning General Optimal Policies with Graph Neural Networks: Expressive Power, Transparency, and Limitscited by 38
  5. 2021Symbols as a Lingua Franca for Bridging Human-AI Chasm for Explainable and Advisable AI Systemscited by 36
  6. 2023Learning adaptive planning representations with natural language guidancecited by 36
  7. 2021Learning First-Order Representations for Planning from Black-Box States: New Resultscited by 23
  8. 2022Learning Generalized Policies Without Supervision Using GNNscited by 22
  9. 2021Classical Planning in Deep Latent Spacecited by 21
  10. 2022Learning Efficient Abstract Planning Models that Choose What to Predictcited by 17
  11. 2024From Pixels to Predicates: Learning Symbolic World Models via Pretrained Vision-Language Modelscited by 11
  12. 2021Discovering User-Interpretable Capabilities of Black-Box Planning Agentscited by 10
26 more
  1. 2021Expressing and Exploiting the Common Subgoal Structure of Classical Planning Domains Using Sketches: Extended Versioncited by 9
  2. 2022Online Learning of Reusable Abstract Models for Object Goal Navigationcited by 9
  3. 2024Learning Lifted STRIPS Models from Action Traces Alone: A Simple, General, and Scalable Solutioncited by 8
  4. 2023PDSketch: Integrated Planning Domain Programming and Learningcited by 7
  5. 2023Learning Logic Specifications for Soft Policy Guidance in POMCPcited by 7
  6. 2021Target Languages (vs. Inductive Biases) for Learning to Act and Plancited by 5
  7. 2025Neuro-Symbolic Imitation Learning: Discovering Symbolic Abstractions for Skill Learningcited by 4
  8. 2024Learning Planning Abstractions from Languagecited by 3
  9. 2025Learning General Policies with Policy Gradient Methodscited by 3
  10. 2022Learning First-Order Symbolic Planning Representations That Are Groundedcited by 2
  11. 2025Learning Lifted Action Models From Traces of Incomplete Actions and Statescited by 2
  12. 2025Few-Shot Neuro-Symbolic Imitation Learning for Long-Horizon Planning and Actingcited by 2
  13. 2025From Next Token Prediction to (STRIPS) World Modelscited by 2
  14. 2026Learning Lifted Action Models from Unsupervised Visual Tracescited by 2
  15. 2022Learning Visual Planning Models from Partially Observed Imagescited by 1
  16. 2023Planning for Learning Object Propertiescited by 1
  17. 2023Influence of the Geometry of the world model on Curiosity Based Explorationcited by 1
  18. 2024Action Model Learning with Guaranteescited by 1
  19. 2026The Price Is Not Right: Neuro-Symbolic Methods Outperform VLAs on Structured Long-Horizon Manipulation Tasks with Significantly Lower Energy Consumptioncited by 1
  20. 2022Language-Based Causal Representation Learningcited by 0
  21. 2022Inapplicable Actions Learning for Knowledge Transfer in Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
  22. 2026Build on Priors: Vision--Language--Guided Neuro-Symbolic Imitation Learning for Data-Efficient Real-World Robot Manipulationcited by 0
  23. 2026Counterfactual Reasoning in Automated Planningcited by 0
  24. 2026Differentiable Learning of Lifted Action Schemas for Classical Planningcited by 0
  25. 2026Learning Lifted Action Models from Traces with Minimal Information About Actions and Statescited by 0
  26. 2026STRIPS-WM: Learning Grounded Propositional STRIPS-style World Models from Imagescited by 0