mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Multi-Class 3D Object Detection with Single-Class Supervision

arXiv 2205.05703 ↗First posted 11 May 2022cs.CV cs.ROcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

While multi-class 3D detectors are needed in many robotics applications, training them with fully labeled datasets can be expensive in labeling cost. An alternative approach is to have targeted single-class labels on disjoint data samples. In this paper, we are interested in training a multi-class 3D object detection model, while using these single-class labeled data. We begin by detailing the unique stance of our "Single-Class Supervision" (SCS) setting with respect to related concepts such as partial supervision and semi supervision. Then, based on the case study of training the multi-class version of Range Sparse Net (RSN), we adapt a spectrum of algorithms -- from supervised learning to pseudo-labeling -- to fully exploit the properties of our SCS setting, and perform extensive ablation studies to identify the most effective algorithm and practice. Empirical experiments on the Waymo Open Dataset show that proper training under SCS can approach or match full supervision training while saving labeling costs.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 May 2022.

Builds on

27 of 38 references.

References · 27

  1. 2019Scalability in Perception for Autonomous Driving: Waymo Open Datasetcited by 2,451
  2. 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,085
  3. 2018PointPillars: Fast Encoders for Object Detection from Point Cloudscited by 1,715
  4. 2017VoxelNet: End-to-End Learning for Point Cloud Based 3D Object Detectioncited by 1,323
  5. 2019Self-training with Noisy Student improves ImageNet classificationcited by 1,311
  6. 2016Temporal Ensembling for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,057
  7. 2018PointRCNN: 3D Object Proposal Generation and Detection from Point Cloudcited by 941
  8. 2017Virtual Adversarial Training: A Regularization Method for Supervised and Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 920
  9. 2017Mean teachers are better role models: Weight-averaged consistency targets improve semi-supervised deep learning resultscited by 472
  10. 2021Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation with Cross Pseudo Supervisioncited by 463
  11. 2016Regularization With Stochastic Transformations and Perturbations for Deep Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 441
  12. 2020Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation with Cross-Consistency Trainingcited by 376
15 more
  1. 2019ReMixMatch: Semi-Supervised Learning with Distribution Alignment and Augmentation Anchoringcited by 349
  2. 2021Unbiased Teacher for Semi-Supervised Object Detectioncited by 306
  3. 2020A Simple Semi-Supervised Learning Framework for Object Detectioncited by 282
  4. 2019Billion-scale semi-supervised learning for image classificationcited by 232
  5. 2020PseudoSeg: Designing Pseudo Labels for Semantic Segmentationcited by 180
  6. 2019End-to-End Multi-View Fusion for 3D Object Detection in LiDAR Point Cloudscited by 171
  7. 2019LaserNet: An Efficient Probabilistic 3D Object Detector for Autonomous Drivingcited by 133
  8. 2021RSN: Range Sparse Net for Efficient, Accurate LiDAR 3D Object Detectioncited by 115
  9. 2019SESS: Self-Ensembling Semi-Supervised 3D Object Detectioncited by 89
  10. 20203DIoUMatch: Leveraging IoU Prediction for Semi-Supervised 3D Object Detectioncited by 89
  11. 2020Proposal Learning for Semi-Supervised Object Detectioncited by 55
  12. 2020Structured Consistency Loss for semi-supervised semantic segmentationcited by 40
  13. 2021Pseudo-labeling for Scalable 3D Object Detectioncited by 32
  14. 2020Improving Semantic Segmentation via Self-Trainingcited by 30
  15. 2019Transferable Semi-supervised 3D Object Detection from RGB-D Datacited by 22

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.

1 paper.