mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Optical Remote Sensing Image Understanding with Weak Supervision: Concepts, Methods, and Perspectives

arXiv 2204.09120 ↗First posted 18 Apr 2022cs.CVcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In recent years, supervised learning has been widely used in various tasks of optical remote sensing image understanding, including remote sensing image classification, pixel-wise segmentation, change detection, and object detection. The methods based on supervised learning need a large amount of high-quality training data and their performance highly depends on the quality of the labels. However, in practical remote sensing applications, it is often expensive and time-consuming to obtain large-scale data sets with high-quality labels, which leads to a lack of sufficient supervised information. In some cases, only coarse-grained labels can be obtained, resulting in the lack of exact supervision. In addition, the supervised information obtained manually may be wrong, resulting in a lack of accurate supervision. Therefore, remote sensing image understanding often faces the problems of incomplete, inexact, and inaccurate supervised information, which will affect the breadth and depth of remote sensing applications. In order to solve the above-mentioned problems, researchers have explored various tasks in remote sensing image understanding under weak supervision. This paper summarizes the research progress of weakly supervised learning in the field of remote sensing, including three typical weakly supervised paradigms: 1) Incomplete supervision, where only a subset of training data is labeled; 2) Inexact supervision, where only coarse-grained labels of training data are given; 3) Inaccurate supervision, where the labels given are not always true on the ground.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 177 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Apr 2022.

Builds on

36 of 177 references.

References · 36

  1. 2016Revisiting Semi-Supervised Learning with Graph Embeddingscited by 970
  2. 2017Deep Bayesian Active Learning with Image Datacited by 812
  3. 2018Exploring the Limits of Weakly Supervised Pretrainingcited by 604
  4. 2020Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 580
  5. 2019Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 499
  6. 2018Deep Learning for Generic Object Detection: A Surveycited by 392
  7. 2018Large Scale Crowdsourcing and Characterization of Twitter Abusive Behaviorcited by 265
  8. 2015Weakly Supervised Deep Detection Networkscited by 183
  9. 2017Cost-Effective Active Learning for Deep Image Classificationcited by 165
  10. 2019NLNL: Negative Learning for Noisy Labelscited by 151
  11. 2020Dual T: Reducing Estimation Error for Transition Matrix in Label-noise Learningcited by 142
  12. 2017Deep learning in remote sensing: a reviewcited by 128
24 more
  1. 2019Deep Learning for Hyperspectral Image Classification: An Overviewcited by 121
  2. 2015Learning with Symmetric Label Noise: The Importance of Being Unhingedcited by 120
  3. 2018Iterative Learning with Open-set Noisy Labelscited by 108
  4. 2019ViewAL: Active Learning with Viewpoint Entropy for Semantic Segmentationcited by 95
  5. 2021Weakly Supervised Object Localization and Detection: A Surveycited by 84
  6. 2020Remote Sensing Image Scene Classification Meets Deep Learning: Challenges, Methods, Benchmarks, and Opportunitiescited by 71
  7. 2013Classification with Asymmetric Label Noise: Consistency and Maximal Denoisingcited by 67
  8. 2021Learning Noise Transition Matrix from Only Noisy Labels via Total Variation Regularizationcited by 62
  9. 2019Deep Learning for Classification of Hyperspectral Data: A Comparative Reviewcited by 51
  10. 2018Transductive Unbiased Embedding for Zero-Shot Learningcited by 44
  11. 2020Feature Extraction for Hyperspectral Imagery: The Evolution from Shallow to Deep (Overview and Toolbox)cited by 36
  12. 2020EvidentialMix: Learning with Combined Open-set and Closed-set Noisy Labelscited by 28
  13. 2021A survey of active learning algorithms for supervised remote sensing image classificationcited by 27
  14. 2020A Survey on Deep Learning with Noisy Labels: How to train your model when you cannot trust on the annotations?cited by 25
  15. 2019Exploring Representativeness and Informativeness for Active Learningcited by 21
  16. 2020Machine Learning Information Fusion in Earth Observation: A Comprehensive Review of Methods, Applications and Data Sourcescited by 19
  17. 2019Active Transfer Learning Network: A Unified Deep Joint Spectral-Spatial Feature Learning Model For Hyperspectral Image Classificationcited by 15
  18. 2020Scribble-based Weakly Supervised Deep Learning for Road Surface Extraction from Remote Sensing Imagescited by 15
  19. 2017Learning with Noise: Enhance Distantly Supervised Relation Extraction with Dynamic Transition Matrixcited by 14
  20. 2018Hyperspectral Image Classification in the Presence of Noisy Labelscited by 12
  21. 2014Crowdsourcing Dialect Characterization through Twittercited by 11
  22. 2021Deep Learning for Weakly-Supervised Object Detection and Object Localization: A Surveycited by 6
  23. 2017Deep Learning Based Large-Scale Automatic Satellite Crosswalk Classificationcited by 3
  24. 2020Uncertainty Quantification for Hyperspectral Image Denoising Frameworks based on Low-rank Matrix Approximationcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 0; 2025: 3.

6 papers.