mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Exploring Representativeness and Informativeness for Active Learning

arXiv 1904.06685 ↗First posted 14 Apr 2019cs.LG stat.MLcited by 21

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

How can we find a general way to choose the most suitable samples for training a classifier? Even with very limited prior information? Active learning, which can be regarded as an iterative optimization procedure, plays a key role to construct a refined training set to improve the classification performance in a variety of applications, such as text analysis, image recognition, social network modeling, etc. Although combining representativeness and informativeness of samples has been proven promising for active sampling, state-of-the-art methods perform well under certain data structures. Then can we find a way to fuse the two active sampling criteria without any assumption on data? This paper proposes a general active learning framework that effectively fuses the two criteria. Inspired by a two-sample discrepancy problem, triple measures are elaborately designed to guarantee that the query samples not only possess the representativeness of the unlabeled data but also reveal the diversity of the labeled data. Any appropriate similarity measure can be employed to construct the triple measures. Meanwhile, an uncertain measure is leveraged to generate the informativeness criterion, which can be carried out in different ways. Rooted in this framework, a practical active learning algorithm is proposed, which exploits a radial basis function together with the estimated probabilities to construct the triple measures and a modified Best-versus-Second-Best strategy to construct the uncertain measure, respectively. Experimental results on benchmark datasets demonstrate that our algorithm consistently achieves superior performance over the state-of-the-art active learning algorithms.

Key facts. Cited by 21 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 14 Apr 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 5; 2022: 3; 2023: 4; 2024: 6; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

21 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2023LLMaAA: Making Large Language Models as Active Annotatorscited by 78
  2. 2021Deep Active Learning by Leveraging Training Dynamicscited by 32
  3. 2021Data Shapley Valuation for Efficient Batch Active Learningcited by 27
  4. 2022Information Gain Propagation: a new way to Graph Active Learning with Soft Labelscited by 16
  5. 2024A Short Survey on Importance Weighting for Machine Learningcited by 15
  6. 2024Neural Active Learning Beyond Banditscited by 10
  7. 2023Does Informativeness Matter? Active Learning for Educational Dialogue Act Classificationcited by 8
  8. 2022Optical Remote Sensing Image Understanding with Weak Supervision: Concepts, Methods, and Perspectivescited by 6
  9. 2024Out-of-Distribution Learning with Human Feedbackcited by 6
  10. 2021Sample Noise Impact on Active Learningcited by 4
  11. 2022Data-Efficient Learning via Minimizing Hyperspherical Energycited by 4
  12. 2021Active Learning of Quantum System Hamiltonians yields Query Advantagecited by 3
9 more
  1. 2023Generative Flow Networks for Precise Reward-Oriented Active Learning on Graphscited by 3
  2. 2024Constructing Enhanced Mutual Information for Online Class-Incremental Learningcited by 2
  3. 2024AI Thinking: A framework for rethinking artificial intelligence in practicecited by 2
  4. 2021Adaptive Local Kernels Formulation of Mutual Information with Application to Active Post-Seismic Building Damage Inferencecited by 0
  5. 2023Active learning for fast and slow modeling attacks on Arbiter PUFscited by 0
  6. 2024Salutary Labeling with Zero Human Annotationcited by 0
  7. 2025Vendi Information Gain for Active Learning and its Application to Ecologycited by 0
  8. 2026A Critical Examination of Active Learning Workflows in Materials Sciencecited by 0
  9. 2026Multi-Agent LLMs for Adaptive Acquisition in Bayesian Optimizationcited by 0