mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Confusing Image Quality Assessment: Towards Better Augmented Reality Experience

arXiv 2204.04900 ↗First posted 11 Apr 2022cs.CV eess.IVcited by 32

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

With the development of multimedia technology, Augmented Reality (AR) has become a promising next-generation mobile platform. The primary value of AR is to promote the fusion of digital contents and real-world environments, however, studies on how this fusion will influence the Quality of Experience (QoE) of these two components are lacking. To achieve better QoE of AR, whose two layers are influenced by each other, it is important to evaluate its perceptual quality first. In this paper, we consider AR technology as the superimposition of virtual scenes and real scenes, and introduce visual confusion as its basic theory. A more general problem is first proposed, which is evaluating the perceptual quality of superimposed images, i.e., confusing image quality assessment. A ConFusing Image Quality Assessment (CFIQA) database is established, which includes 600 reference images and 300 distorted images generated by mixing reference images in pairs. Then a subjective quality perception study and an objective model evaluation experiment are conducted towards attaining a better understanding of how humans perceive the confusing images. An objective metric termed CFIQA is also proposed to better evaluate the confusing image quality. Moreover, an extended ARIQA study is further conducted based on the CFIQA study. We establish an ARIQA database to better simulate the real AR application scenarios, which contains 20 AR reference images, 20 background (BG) reference images, and 560 distorted images generated from AR and BG references, as well as the correspondingly collected subjective quality ratings. We also design three types of full-reference (FR) IQA metrics to study whether we should consider the visual confusion when designing corresponding IQA algorithms. An ARIQA metric is finally proposed for better evaluating the perceptual quality of AR images.

Key facts. Cited by 32 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 93 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Apr 2022.

Builds on

17 of 93 references.

References · 17

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  3. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  4. 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,177
  5. 2017Squeeze-and-Excitation Networkscited by 4,789
  6. 2016Perceptual Losses for Real-Time Style Transfer and Super-Resolutioncited by 2,694
  7. 2021Ego4D: Around the World in 3,000 Hours of Egocentric Videocited by 1,556
  8. 2016SqueezeNet: AlexNet-level accuracy with 50x fewer parameters and <0.5MB model sizecited by 1,060
  9. 2020Image Quality Assessment: Unifying Structure and Texture Similaritycited by 811
  10. 2019KonIQ-10k: An ecologically valid database for deep learning of blind image quality assessmentcited by 355
  11. 2016Deep Neural Networks for No-Reference and Full-Reference Image Quality Assessmentcited by 225
  12. 2013Gradient Magnitude Similarity Deviation: A Highly Efficient Perceptual Image Quality Indexcited by 195
5 more
  1. 2016Richer Convolutional Features for Edge Detectioncited by 143
  2. 2020Unified Image and Video Saliency Modelingcited by 75
  3. 2021No-Reference Quality Assessment for 360-degree Images by Analysis of Multi-frequency Information and Local-global Naturalnesscited by 20
  4. 2017A Perceptually Weighted Rank Correlation Indicator for Objective Image Quality Assessmentcited by 13
  5. 2021Subjective and Objective Visual Quality Assessment of Textured 3D Meshescited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 4; 2024: 11; 2025: 8; 2026: 8.

32 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2023AIGCIQA2023: A Large-scale Image Quality Assessment Database for AI Generated Images: from the Perspectives of Quality, Authenticity and Correspondencecited by 61
  2. 2024FineVQ: Fine-Grained User Generated Content Video Quality Assessmentcited by 28
  3. 2024AIGV-Assessor: Benchmarking and Evaluating the Perceptual Quality of Text-to-Video Generation with LMMcited by 24
  4. 2022Saliency in Augmented Realitycited by 17
  5. 2024AIGCOIQA2024: Perceptual Quality Assessment of AI Generated Omnidirectional Imagescited by 16
  6. 2025ViDDAR: Vision Language Model-Based Task-Detrimental Content Detection for Augmented Realitycited by 16
  7. 2023PKU-I2IQA: An Image-to-Image Quality Assessment Database for AI Generated Imagescited by 14
  8. 2024Quality Assessment for AI Generated Images with Instruction Tuningcited by 13
  9. 2023Perceptual Quality Assessment of Omnidirectional Audio-visual Signalscited by 12
  10. 2025MoA-VR: A Mixture-of-Agents System Towards All-in-One Video Restorationcited by 12
  11. 2025Omni2: Unifying Omnidirectional Image Generation and Editing in an Omni Modelcited by 9
  12. 2025A Neurosymbolic Framework for Interpretable Cognitive Attack Detection in Augmented Realitycited by 8
20 more
  1. 2023Audio-visual Saliency for Omnidirectional Videoscited by 7
  2. 2024How is Visual Attention Influenced by Text Guidance? Database and Modelcited by 7
  3. 2024ESIQA: Perceptual Quality Assessment of Vision-Pro-based Egocentric Spatial Imagescited by 7
  4. 2025HarmonyIQA: Pioneering Benchmark and Model for Image Harmonization Quality Assessmentcited by 7
  5. 2024How Does Audio Influence Visual Attention in Omnidirectional Videos? Database and Modelcited by 4
  6. 2025RGC-VQA: An Exploration Database for Robotic-Generated Video Quality Assessmentcited by 4
  7. 2026Evaluating Image Editing with LLMs: A Comprehensive Benchmark and Intermediate-Layer Probing Approachcited by 3
  8. 2026Market-Bench: Benchmarking Large Language Models on Economic and Trade Competitioncited by 3
  9. 2024MVBIND: Self-Supervised Music Recommendation For Videos Via Embedding Space Bindingcited by 2
  10. 2024Quality-guided Skin Tone Enhancement for Portrait Photographycited by 2
  11. 2024ESVQA: Perceptual Quality Assessment of Egocentric Spatial Videoscited by 2
  12. 2025Quality Assessment and Distortion-aware Saliency Prediction for AI-Generated Omnidirectional Imagescited by 2
  13. 2024Enhancing Content Representation for AR Image Quality Assessment Using Knowledge Distillationcited by 0
  14. 2025Immersive Multimedia Communication: State-of-the-Art on eXtended Reality Streamingcited by 0
  15. 2026Robust Mesh Saliency Ground Truth Acquisition in VR via View Cone Sampling and Manifold Diffusioncited by 0
  16. 2026Enhancing Image Quality Assessment Ability of LMMs via Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 0
  17. 2026Preference-Guided Debiasing for No-Reference Enhancement Image Quality Assessmentcited by 0
  18. 2026ARIQA-3DS: A Stereoscopic Image Quality Assessment Dataset for Realistic Augmented Realitycited by 0
  19. 2026ITIScore: An Image-to-Text-to-Image Rating Framework for the Image Captioning Ability of MLLMscited by 0
  20. 2026Harnessing Vision-Language Models for Perceptual Quality Assessment and Autonomous Content Adjustment in Augmented Realitycited by 0