mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Quality Assessment for AI Generated Images with Instruction Tuning

arXiv 2405.07346 ↗First posted 12 May 2024cs.CVcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Artificial Intelligence Generated Content (AIGC) has grown rapidly in recent years, among which AI-based image generation has gained widespread attention due to its efficient and imaginative image creation ability. However, AI-generated Images (AIGIs) may not satisfy human preferences due to their unique distortions, which highlights the necessity to understand and evaluate human preferences for AIGIs. To this end, in this paper, we first establish a novel Image Quality Assessment (IQA) database for AIGIs, termed AIGCIQA2023+, which provides human visual preference scores and detailed preference explanations from three perspectives including quality, authenticity, and correspondence. Then, based on the constructed AIGCIQA2023+ database, this paper presents a MINT-IQA model to evaluate and explain human preferences for AIGIs from Multi-perspectives with INstruction Tuning. Specifically, the MINT-IQA model first learn and evaluate human preferences for AI-generated Images from multi-perspectives, then via the vision-language instruction tuning strategy, MINT-IQA attains powerful understanding and explanation ability for human visual preference on AIGIs, which can be used for feedback to further improve the assessment capabilities. Extensive experimental results demonstrate that the proposed MINT-IQA model achieves state-of-the-art performance in understanding and evaluating human visual preferences for AIGIs, and the proposed model also achieves competing results on traditional IQA tasks compared with state-of-the-art IQA models. The AIGCIQA2023+ database and MINT-IQA model are available at: https://github.com/IntMeGroup/MINT-IQA.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 63 of its 122 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 May 2024.

Builds on

63 of 122 references.

References · 63

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  3. 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,694
  4. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  5. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
  6. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  7. 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,792
  8. 2022Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latentscited by 6,539
  9. 2023BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Modelscited by 6,069
  10. 2023Adding Conditional Control to Text-to-Image Diffusion Modelscited by 5,466
  11. 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generationcited by 4,310
  12. 2021Zero-Shot Text-to-Image Generationcited by 4,276
38 more
  1. 2022LAION-5B: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text modelscited by 4,131
  2. 2021GLIDE: Towards Photorealistic Image Generation and Editing with Text-Guided Diffusion Modelscited by 3,595
  3. 2016Improved Techniques for Training GANscited by 2,938
  4. 2023InstructBLIP: Towards General-purpose Vision-Language Models with Instruction Tuningcited by 2,855
  5. 2017Improved Training of Wasserstein GANscited by 2,223
  6. 2022Scaling Autoregressive Models for Content-Rich Text-to-Image Generationcited by 1,287
  7. 2021MUSIQ: Multi-scale Image Quality Transformercited by 1,058
  8. 2023ImageReward: Learning and Evaluating Human Preferences for Text-to-Image Generationcited by 1,010
  9. 2022Exploring CLIP for Assessing the Look and Feel of Imagescited by 974
  10. 2023Pick-a-Pic: An Open Dataset of User Preferences for Text-to-Image Generationcited by 950
  11. 2020Image Quality Assessment: Unifying Structure and Texture Similaritycited by 792
  12. 2022EVA: Exploring the Limits of Masked Visual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 685
  13. 2017NIMA: Neural Image Assessmentcited by 387
  14. 2022DiffusionDB: A Large-scale Prompt Gallery Dataset for Text-to-Image Generative Modelscited by 376
  15. 2019KonIQ-10k: An ecologically valid database for deep learning of blind image quality assessmentcited by 351
  16. 2022Scaling Language-Image Pre-training via Maskingcited by 317
  17. 2019Blind Image Quality Assessment Using A Deep Bilinear Convolutional Neural Networkcited by 301
  18. 2023Human Preference Score: Better Aligning Text-to-Image Models with Human Preferencecited by 284
  19. 2023Blind Image Quality Assessment via Vision-Language Correspondence: A Multitask Learning Perspectivecited by 276
  20. 2023Q-Bench: A Benchmark for General-Purpose Foundation Models on Low-level Visioncited by 247
  21. 2016Deep Neural Networks for No-Reference and Full-Reference Image Quality Assessmentcited by 224
  22. 2019From Patches to Pictures (PaQ-2-PiQ): Mapping the Perceptual Space of Picture Qualitycited by 221
  23. 2015Massive Online Crowdsourced Study of Subjective and Objective Picture Qualitycited by 208
  24. 2023One Transformer Fits All Distributions in Multi-Modal Diffusion at Scalecited by 185
  25. 2022FAST-VQA: Efficient End-to-end Video Quality Assessment with Fragment Samplingcited by 179
  26. 2021No-Reference Image Quality Assessment via Transformers, Relative Ranking, and Self-Consistencycited by 165
  27. 2020MetaIQA: Deep Meta-learning for No-Reference Image Quality Assessmentcited by 144
  28. 2023AGIQA-3K: An Open Database for AI-Generated Image Quality Assessmentcited by 142
  29. 2020UGC-VQA: Benchmarking Blind Video Quality Assessment for User Generated Contentcited by 140
  30. 2021LAFITE: Towards Language-Free Training for Text-to-Image Generationcited by 126
  31. 2016Photo Aesthetics Ranking Network with Attributes and Content Adaptationcited by 122
  32. 2021RAPIQUE: Rapid and Accurate Video Quality Prediction of User Generated Contentcited by 100
  33. 2023Re-IQA: Unsupervised Learning for Image Quality Assessment in the Wildcited by 97
  34. 2021Image Quality Assessment using Contrastive Learningcited by 95
  35. 2020Transformer for Image Quality Assessmentcited by 76
  36. 2016Perceptual Quality Prediction on Authentically Distorted Images Using a Bag of Features Approachcited by 71
  37. 2021Blind Quality Assessment for in-the-Wild Images via Hierarchical Feature Fusion and Iterative Mixed Database Trainingcited by 71
  38. 2023AIGCIQA2023: A Large-scale Image Quality Assessment Database for AI Generated Images: from the Perspectives of Quality, Authenticity and Correspondencecited by 61

50 most cited of 63 All 63 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 5; 2026: 5.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area: