mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

RGC-VQA: An Exploration Database for Robotic-Generated Video Quality Assessment

arXiv 2506.23852 ↗First posted 30 Jun 2025cs.CVcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As camera-equipped robotic platforms become increasingly integrated into daily life, robotic-generated videos have begun to appear on streaming media platforms, enabling us to envision a future where humans and robots coexist. We innovatively propose the concept of Robotic-Generated Content (RGC) to term these videos generated from egocentric perspective of robots. The perceptual quality of RGC videos is critical in human-robot interaction scenarios, and RGC videos exhibit unique distortions and visual requirements that differ markedly from those of professionally-generated content (PGC) videos and user-generated content (UGC) videos. However, dedicated research on quality assessment of RGC videos is still lacking. To address this gap and to support broader robotic applications, we establish the first Robotic-Generated Content Database (RGCD), which contains a total of 2,100 videos drawn from three robot categories and sourced from diverse platforms. A subjective VQA experiment is conducted subsequently to assess human visual perception of robotic-generated videos. Finally, we conduct a benchmark experiment to evaluate the performance of 11 state-of-the-art VQA models on our database. Experimental results reveal significant limitations in existing VQA models when applied to complex, robotic-generated content, highlighting a critical need for RGC-specific VQA models. Our RGCD is publicly available at: https://github.com/IntMeGroup/RGC-VQA.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jun 2025.

Builds on

22 of 54 references.

References · 22

  1. 2018BDD100K: A Diverse Driving Dataset for Heterogeneous Multitask Learningcited by 1,288
  2. 2023Ego-Exo4D: Understanding Skilled Human Activity from First- and Third-Person Perspectivescited by 490
  3. 2022Exploring Video Quality Assessment on User Generated Contents from Aesthetic and Technical Perspectivescited by 320
  4. 2022FAST-VQA: Efficient End-to-end Video Quality Assessment with Fragment Samplingcited by 179
  5. 2019Quality Assessment of In-the-Wild Videoscited by 164
  6. 2020Patch-VQ: 'Patching Up' the Video Quality Problemcited by 147
  7. 2022A Deep Learning based No-reference Quality Assessment Model for UGC Videoscited by 129
  8. 2018Large-Scale Study of Perceptual Video Qualitycited by 127
  9. 2019YouTube UGC Dataset for Video Compression Researchcited by 124
  10. 2021RAPIQUE: Rapid and Accurate Video Quality Prediction of User Generated Contentcited by 100
  11. 2020Uncertainty-based Traffic Accident Anticipation with Spatio-Temporal Relational Learningcited by 91
  12. 2020Learning Generalized Spatial-Temporal Deep Feature Representation for No-Reference Video Quality Assessmentcited by 50
10 more
  1. 2024KVQ: Kwai Video Quality Assessment for Short-form Videoscited by 38
  2. 2022Confusing Image Quality Assessment: Towards Better Augmented Reality Experiencecited by 32
  3. 2024AIGV-Assessor: Benchmarking and Evaluating the Perceptual Quality of Text-to-Video Generation with LMMcited by 24
  4. 2024UniProcessor: A Text-induced Unified Low-level Image Processorcited by 22
  5. 2019UGC-VIDEO: perceptual quality assessment of user-generated videoscited by 19
  6. 2024All Robots in One: A New Standard and Unified Dataset for Versatile, General-Purpose Embodied Agentscited by 15
  7. 2025FVQ: A Large-Scale Dataset and an LMM-based Method for Face Video Quality Assessmentcited by 13
  8. 2025Image Quality Assessment: From Human to Machine Preferencecited by 12
  9. 2025TDVE-Assessor: Benchmarking and Evaluating the Quality of Text-Driven Video Editing with LMMscited by 11
  10. 2024Embodied Image Quality Assessment for Robotic Intelligencecited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

4 papers.