Augmenting Knowledge Graphs for Better Link Prediction
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Embedding methods have demonstrated robust performance on the task of link prediction in knowledge graphs, by mostly encoding entity relationships. Recent methods propose to enhance the loss function with a literal-aware term. In this paper, we propose KGA: a knowledge graph augmentation method that incorporates literals in an embedding model without modifying its loss function. KGA discretizes quantity and year values into bins, and chains these bins both horizontally, modeling neighboring values, and vertically, modeling multiple levels of granularity. KGA is scalable and can be used as a pre-processing step for any existing knowledge graph embedding model. Experiments on legacy benchmarks and a new large benchmark, DWD, show that augmenting the knowledge graph with quantities and years is beneficial for predicting both entities and numbers, as KGA outperforms the vanilla models and other relevant baselines. Our ablation studies confirm that both quantities and years contribute to KGA's performance, and that its performance depends on the discretization and binning settings. We make the code, models, and the DWD benchmark publicly available to facilitate reproducibility and future research.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Mar 2022.
Builds on
14 of 36 references.
References · 14
- 2014Embedding Entities and Relations for Learning and Inference in Knowledge Basescited by 929
- 2016Complex Embeddings for Simple Link Predictioncited by 897
- 2019RotatE: Knowledge Graph Embedding by Relational Rotation in Complex Spacecited by 893
- 2017Convolutional 2D Knowledge Graph Embeddingscited by 729
- 2019TuckER: Tensor Factorization for Knowledge Graph Completioncited by 290
- 2019PyTorch-BigGraph: A Large-scale Graph Embedding Systemcited by 118
- 2020Tensor Decompositions for temporal knowledge base completioncited by 115
- 2019MMKG: Multi-Modal Knowledge Graphscited by 104
- 2019A Survey on Knowledge Graph Embeddings with Literals: Which model links better Literal-ly?cited by 31
- 2018Incorporating Literals into Knowledge Graph Embeddingscited by 29
- 2017KBLRN : End-to-End Learning of Knowledge Base Representations with Latent, Relational, and Numerical Featurescited by 25
- 2016SSP: Semantic Space Projection for Knowledge Graph Embedding with Text Descriptionscited by 18
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
7 papers.
- 2024NativE: Multi-modal Knowledge Graph Completion in the Wildcited by 23
- 2023Universal Preprocessing Operators for Embedding Knowledge Graphs with Literalscited by 4
- 2023Literal-Aware Knowledge Graph Embedding for Welding Quality Monitoring: A Bosch Casecited by 2
- 2024Numerical Literals in Link Prediction: A Critical Examination of Models and Datasetscited by 2
- 2025ReaLitE: Enrichment of Relation Embeddings in Knowledge Graphs using Numeric Literalscited by 2
- 2025CHAINSFORMER: Numerical Reasoning on Knowledge Graphs from a Chain Perspectivecited by 1
- 2026Neural Regression with Embeddings for Numerical Attribute Prediction in Knowledge Graphscited by 0
- 2026Neural Regression with Embeddings for Numerical Attribute Prediction in Knowledge Graphs27 Aug 2026
- 2025CHAINSFORMER: Numerical Reasoning on Knowledge Graphs from a Chain Perspective19 Apr 2025
- 2025ReaLitE: Enrichment of Relation Embeddings in Knowledge Graphs using Numeric Literals1 Apr 2025
- 2024Numerical Literals in Link Prediction: A Critical Examination of Models and Datasets25 Jul 2024
- 2024NativE: Multi-modal Knowledge Graph Completion in the Wild28 Mar 2024
- 2023Universal Preprocessing Operators for Embedding Knowledge Graphs with Literals6 Sep 2023
- 2023Literal-Aware Knowledge Graph Embedding for Welding Quality Monitoring: A Bosch Case2 Aug 2023