mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

REX: Reasoning-aware and Grounded Explanation

arXiv 2203.06107 ↗First posted 11 Mar 2022cs.CVcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Effectiveness and interpretability are two essential properties for trustworthy AI systems. Most recent studies in visual reasoning are dedicated to improving the accuracy of predicted answers, and less attention is paid to explaining the rationales behind the decisions. As a result, they commonly take advantage of spurious biases instead of actually reasoning on the visual-textual data, and have yet developed the capability to explain their decision making by considering key information from both modalities. This paper aims to close the gap from three distinct perspectives: first, we define a new type of multi-modal explanations that explain the decisions by progressively traversing the reasoning process and grounding keywords in the images. We develop a functional program to sequentially execute different reasoning steps and construct a new dataset with 1,040,830 multi-modal explanations. Second, we identify the critical need to tightly couple important components across the visual and textual modalities for explaining the decisions, and propose a novel explanation generation method that explicitly models the pairwise correspondence between words and regions of interest. It improves the visual grounding capability by a considerable margin, resulting in enhanced interpretability and reasoning performance. Finally, with our new data and method, we perform extensive analyses to study the effectiveness of our explanation under different settings, including multi-task learning and transfer learning. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/szzexpoi/rex.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 35 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Mar 2022.

Builds on

35 of 44 references.

References · 35

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  4. 2016Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotationscited by 2,646
  5. 2016Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,498
  6. 2015VQA: Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,489
  7. 2019ViLBERT: Pretraining Task-Agnostic Visiolinguistic Representations for Vision-and-Language Taskscited by 2,219
  8. 2014CIDEr: Consensus-based Image Description Evaluationcited by 2,027
  9. 2019LXMERT: Learning Cross-Modality Encoder Representations from Transformerscited by 1,548
  10. 2016CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoningcited by 1,445
  11. 2017Bottom-Up and Top-Down Attention for Image Captioning and Visual Question Answeringcited by 1,310
  12. 2020Oscar: Object-Semantics Aligned Pre-training for Vision-Language Taskscited by 1,213
23 more
  1. 2019OK-VQA: A Visual Question Answering Benchmark Requiring External Knowledgecited by 1,114
  2. 2016ConceptNet 5.5: An Open Multilingual Graph of General Knowledgecited by 1,065
  3. 2016SPICE: Semantic Propositional Image Caption Evaluationcited by 820
  4. 2021Multimodal Few-Shot Learning with Frozen Language Modelscited by 657
  5. 2018From Recognition to Cognition: Visual Commonsense Reasoningcited by 553
  6. 2019Scene Text Visual Question Answeringcited by 327
  7. 2018Bilinear Attention Networkscited by 277
  8. 2016Multimodal Compact Bilinear Pooling for Visual Question Answering and Visual Groundingcited by 243
  9. 2018Multimodal Explanations: Justifying Decisions and Pointing to the Evidencecited by 179
  10. 2017Multi-modal Factorized Bilinear Pooling with Co-Attention Learning for Visual Question Answeringcited by 117
  11. 2019Learning by Abstraction: The Neural State Machinecited by 113
  12. 2018Explainable and Explicit Visual Reasoning over Scene Graphscited by 103
  13. 2020Roses Are Red, Violets Are Blue... but Should Vqa Expect Them To?cited by 69
  14. 2018Faithful Multimodal Explanation for Visual Question Answeringcited by 64
  15. 2019Self-Critical Reasoning for Robust Visual Question Answeringcited by 61
  16. 2018Explainable Neural Computation via Stack Neural Module Networkscited by 54
  17. 2018VQA-E: Explaining, Elaborating, and Enhancing Your Answers for Visual Questionscited by 50
  18. 2020Natural Language Rationales with Full-Stack Visual Reasoning: From Pixels to Semantic Frames to Commonsense Graphscited by 46
  19. 2018Explicit Bias Discovery in Visual Question Answering Modelscited by 42
  20. 2020AiR: Attention with Reasoning Capabilitycited by 28
  21. 2021Separating Skills and Concepts for Novel Visual Question Answeringcited by 24
  22. 2020Beyond VQA: Generating Multi-word Answer and Rationale to Visual Questionscited by 19
  23. 2020Improving VQA and its Explanations by Comparing Competing Explanationscited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 4; 2024: 4; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

12 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025V-REX: Benchmarking Exploratory Visual Reasoning via Chain-of-Questions
  2. 2026Evaluating Explanation-Driven Vision-Language Reasoning via Generation Order Interventions
  3. 2025Transparent Visual Reasoning via Object-Centric Agent Collaboration
  4. 2026The Abstraction Gap in Vision-Language Causal Reasoning
  5. 2026GridVQA-X: A Framework for Evaluating Multimodal Explainability Methods
  6. 2025DEXTER: Diffusion-Guided EXplanations with TExtual Reasoning for Vision Models
  7. 2024Take A Step Back: Rethinking the Two Stages in Visual Reasoning
  8. 2025VERIFY: A Benchmark of Visual Explanation and Reasoning for Investigating Multimodal Reasoning Fidelity