mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Multimodal Coherent Explanation Generation of Robot Failures

arXiv 2410.00659 ↗First posted 1 Oct 2024cs.RO cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The explainability of a robot's actions is crucial to its acceptance in social spaces. Explaining why a robot fails to complete a given task is particularly important for non-expert users to be aware of the robot's capabilities and limitations. So far, research on explaining robot failures has only considered generating textual explanations, even though several studies have shown the benefits of multimodal ones. However, a simple combination of multiple modalities may lead to semantic incoherence between the information across different modalities - a problem that is not well-studied. An incoherent multimodal explanation can be difficult to understand, and it may even become inconsistent with what the robot and the human observe and how they perform reasoning with the observations. Such inconsistencies may lead to wrong conclusions about the robot's capabilities. In this paper, we introduce an approach to generate coherent multimodal explanations by checking the logical coherence of explanations from different modalities, followed by refinements as required. We propose a classification approach for coherence assessment, where we evaluate if an explanation logically follows another. Our experiments suggest that fine-tuning a neural network that was pre-trained to recognize textual entailment, performs well for coherence assessment of multimodal explanations. Code & data: https://pradippramanick.github.io/coherent-explain/.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2024.

Builds on

24 of 40 references.

References · 24

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,304
  2. 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,676
  3. 2021DeBERTaV3: Improving DeBERTa using ELECTRA-Style Pre-Training with Gradient-Disentangled Embedding Sharingcited by 1,239
  4. 2020Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 1,027
  5. 2017AI2-THOR: An Interactive 3D Environment for Visual AIcited by 859
  6. 2018Multimodal Explanations: Justifying Decisions and Pointing to the Evidencecited by 179
  7. 2023REFLECT: Summarizing Robot Experiences for Failure Explanation and Correctioncited by 173
  8. 2019Simple BERT Models for Relation Extraction and Semantic Role Labelingcited by 154
  9. 2021A Token-level Reference-free Hallucination Detection Benchmark for Free-form Text Generationcited by 137
  10. 2022End-to-End Multimodal Fact-Checking and Explanation Generation: A Challenging Dataset and Modelscited by 105
  11. 2019Automated Rationale Generation: A Technique for Explainable AI and its Effects on Human Perceptionscited by 81
  12. 2021GLocalX -- From Local to Global Explanations of Black Box AI Modelscited by 48
12 more
  1. 2021Explainable AI for Robot Failures: Generating Explanations that Improve User Assistance in Fault Recoverycited by 32
  2. 2020Clue: Cross-modal Coherence Modeling for Caption Generationcited by 24
  3. 2023Support or Refute: Analyzing the Stance of Evidence to Detect Out-of-Context Mis- and Disinformationcited by 21
  4. 2020A Study on Multimodal and Interactive Explanations for Visual Question Answeringcited by 14
  5. 2020FINO-Net: A Deep Multimodal Sensor Fusion Framework for Manipulation Failure Detectioncited by 13
  6. 2022Why did I fail? A Causal-based Method to Find Explanations for Robot Failurescited by 13
  7. 2021Semantic-Based Explainable AI: Leveraging Semantic Scene Graphs and Pairwise Ranking to Explain Robot Failurescited by 12
  8. 2022REX: Reasoning-aware and Grounded Explanationcited by 12
  9. 2019Understanding, Categorizing and Predicting Semantic Image-Text Relationscited by 4
  10. 2020Feature Guided Search for Creative Problem Solving Through Tool Constructioncited by 4
  11. 2023A Surrogate Model Framework for Explainable Autonomous Behaviourcited by 4
  12. 2020What went wrong?: Identification of Everyday Object Manipulation Anomaliescited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.