mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Suspected Object Matters: Rethinking Model's Prediction for One-stage Visual Grounding

arXiv 2203.05186 ↗First posted 10 Mar 2022cs.CV cs.AIcited by 4

On the map: LLM reasoning → Multimodal reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Recently, one-stage visual grounders attract high attention due to their comparable accuracy but significantly higher efficiency than two-stage grounders. However, inter-object relation modeling has not been well studied for one-stage grounders. Inter-object relationship modeling, though important, is not necessarily performed among all objects, as only part of them are related to the text query and may confuse the model. We call these objects suspected objects. However, exploring their relationships in the one-stage paradigm is non-trivial because: First, no object proposals are available as the basis on which to select suspected objects and perform relationship modeling. Second, suspected objects are more confusing than others, as they may share similar semantics, be entangled with certain relationships, etc, and thereby more easily mislead the model prediction. Toward this end, we propose a Suspected Object Transformation mechanism (SOT), which can be seamlessly integrated into existing CNN and Transformer-based one-stage visual grounders to encourage the target object selection among the suspected ones. Suspected objects are dynamically discovered from a learned activation map adapted to the model current discrimination ability during training. Afterward, on top of suspected objects, a Keyword-Aware Discrimination module (KAD) and an Exploration by Random Connection strategy (ERC) are concurrently proposed to help the model rethink its initial prediction. On the one hand, KAD leverages keywords contributing high to suspected object discrimination. On the other hand, ERC allows the model to seek the correct object instead of being trapped in a situation that always exploits the current false prediction. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed method.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Multimodal reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 49 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Mar 2022.

Builds on

49 of 65 references.

References · 49

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  4. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  5. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
  6. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
  7. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,854
  8. 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,259
  9. 2016Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detectioncited by 5,021
  10. 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 4,993
  11. 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,829
  12. 2015SSD: Single Shot MultiBox Detectorcited by 3,125
37 more
  1. 2017Non-local Neural Networkscited by 2,290
  2. 2017FiLM: Visual Reasoning with a General Conditioning Layercited by 2,286
  3. 2019HuggingFace's Transformers: State-of-the-art Natural Language Processingcited by 2,201
  4. 2019FCOS: Fully Convolutional One-Stage Object Detectioncited by 1,573
  5. 2017Deformable Convolutional Networkscited by 1,481
  6. 2015Multi-Scale Context Aggregation by Dilated Convolutionscited by 1,128
  7. 2016Modeling Context in Referring Expressionscited by 1,054
  8. 2015Generation and Comprehension of Unambiguous Object Descriptionscited by 897
  9. 2018MAttNet: Modular Attention Network for Referring Expression Comprehensioncited by 427
  10. 2019REVERIE: Remote Embodied Visual Referring Expression in Real Indoor Environmentscited by 330
  11. 2021TransVG: End-to-End Visual Grounding with Transformerscited by 269
  12. 2019A Fast and Accurate One-Stage Approach to Visual Groundingcited by 194
  13. 2021Referring Transformer: A One-step Approach to Multi-task Visual Groundingcited by 143
  14. 2018Learning to Assemble Neural Module Tree Networks for Visual Groundingcited by 139
  15. 2020Improving One-stage Visual Grounding by Recursive Sub-query Constructioncited by 137
  16. 2015Natural Language Object Retrievalcited by 124
  17. 2017Learning Two-Branch Neural Networks for Image-Text Matching Taskscited by 119
  18. 2019A Real-Time Cross-modality Correlation Filtering Method for Referring Expression Comprehensioncited by 111
  19. 2019Dynamic Graph Attention for Referring Expression Comprehensioncited by 111
  20. 2016Modeling Relationships in Referential Expressions with Compositional Modular Networkscited by 106
  21. 2018Neighbourhood Watch: Referring Expression Comprehension via Language-guided Graph Attention Networkscited by 102
  22. 2019Improving Referring Expression Grounding with Cross-modal Attention-guided Erasingcited by 88
  23. 2017Grounding Referring Expressions in Images by Variational Contextcited by 82
  24. 2019Zero-Shot Grounding of Objects from Natural Language Queriescited by 79
  25. 2020Referring Expression Comprehension: A Survey of Methods and Datasetscited by 78
  26. 2016A Joint Speaker-Listener-Reinforcer Model for Referring Expressionscited by 74
  27. 2020Graph-Structured Referring Expression Reasoning in The Wildcited by 58
  28. 2017Parallel Attention: A Unified Framework for Visual Object Discovery through Dialogs and Queriescited by 56
  29. 2018Real-Time Referring Expression Comprehension by Single-Stage Grounding Networkcited by 56
  30. 2021Look Before You Leap: Learning Landmark Features for One-Stage Visual Groundingcited by 51
  31. 2017Conditional Image-Text Embedding Networkscited by 50
  32. 2020Ref-NMS: Breaking Proposal Bottlenecks in Two-Stage Referring Expression Groundingcited by 50
  33. 2018Rethinking Diversified and Discriminative Proposal Generation for Visual Groundingcited by 49
  34. 2019Learning Cross-modal Context Graph for Visual Groundingcited by 49
  35. 2021Discriminative Triad Matching and Reconstruction for Weakly Referring Expression Groundingcited by 21
  36. 2021Two-stage Visual Cues Enhancement Network for Referring Image Segmentationcited by 13
  37. 2019Revisiting Visual Groundingcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 3.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Learning Visual Grounding from Generative Vision and Language Model
  2. 2023GroundVLP: Harnessing Zero-shot Visual Grounding from Vision-Language Pre-training and Open-Vocabulary Object Detection
  3. 2025Rex-Thinker: Grounded Object Referring via Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
  4. 2023The role of object-centric representations, guided attention, and external memory on generalizing visual relations
  5. 2024Visual Reasoning in Object-Centric Deep Neural Networks: A Comparative Cognition Approach
  6. 2025Connecting the Dots: Training-Free Visual Grounding via Agentic Reasoning
  7. 2022Improving Visual Grounding by Encouraging Consistent Gradient-based Explanations
  8. 2026From Routing Signals to Selective Review: Visual regrounding in MoE VLMs