mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

LEBP -- Language Expectation & Binding Policy: A Two-Stream Framework for Embodied Vision-and-Language Interaction Task Learning Agents

arXiv 2203.04637 ↗First posted 9 Mar 2022cs.AI cs.CLcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

People always desire an embodied agent that can perform a task by understanding language instruction. Moreover, they also want to monitor and expect agents to understand commands the way they expected. But, how to build such an embodied agent is still unclear. Recently, people can explore this problem with the Vision-and-Language Interaction benchmark ALFRED, which requires an agent to perform complicated daily household tasks following natural language instructions in unseen scenes. In this paper, we propose LEBP -- Language Expectation and Binding Policy Module to tackle the ALFRED. The LEBP contains a two-stream process: 1) It first conducts a language expectation module to generate an expectation describing how to perform tasks by understanding the language instruction. The expectation consists of a sequence of sub-steps for the task (e.g., Pick an apple). The expectation allows people to access and check the understanding results of instructions before the agent takes actual actions, in case the task might go wrong. 2) Then, it uses the binding policy module to bind sub-steps in expectation to actual actions to specific scenarios. Actual actions include navigation and object manipulation. Experimental results suggest our approach achieves comparable performance to currently published SOTA methods and can avoid large decay from seen scenarios to unseen scenarios.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Mar 2022.

Builds on

20 of 26 references.

References · 20

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  3. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
  4. 2014Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networkscited by 2,974
  5. 2019HuggingFace's Transformers: State-of-the-art Natural Language Processingcited by 2,201
  6. 2017AI2-THOR: An Interactive 3D Environment for Visual AIcited by 850
  7. 2019ALFRED: A Benchmark for Interpreting Grounded Instructions for Everyday Taskscited by 773
  8. 2017Embodied Question Answeringcited by 335
  9. 2021Episodic Transformer for Vision-and-Language Navigationcited by 155
  10. 2020iGibson 1.0: a Simulation Environment for Interactive Tasks in Large Realistic Scenescited by 151
  11. 2021FILM: Following Instructions in Language with Modular Methodscited by 119
  12. 2021Visual Room Rearrangementcited by 101
8 more
  1. 2021A Persistent Spatial Semantic Representation for High-level Natural Language Instruction Executioncited by 91
  2. 2019Interactive Gibson Benchmark (iGibson 0.5): A Benchmark for Interactive Navigation in Cluttered Environmentscited by 89
  3. 2021Embodied BERT: A Transformer Model for Embodied, Language-guided Visual Task Completioncited by 57
  4. 2021Hierarchical Task Learning from Language Instructions with Unified Transformers and Self-Monitoringcited by 53
  5. 2021Look Wide and Interpret Twice: Improving Performance on Interactive Instruction-following Taskscited by 25
  6. 2019Why Build an Assistant in Minecraft?cited by 14
  7. 2021Modular Framework for Visuomotor Language Groundingcited by 9
  8. 2016Virtual Embodiment: A Scalable Long-Term Strategy for Artificial Intelligence Researchcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 4; 2023: 4; 2024: 3.

11 papers.