mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Onception: Active Learning with Expert Advice for Real World Machine Translation

arXiv 2203.04507 ↗First posted 9 Mar 2022cs.CLcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Active learning can play an important role in low-resource settings (i.e., where annotated data is scarce), by selecting which instances may be more worthy to annotate. Most active learning approaches for Machine Translation assume the existence of a pool of sentences in a source language, and rely on human annotators to provide translations or post-edits, which can still be costly. In this article, we assume a real world human-in-the-loop scenario in which: (i) the source sentences may not be readily available, but instead arrive in a stream; (ii) the automatic translations receive feedback in the form of a rating, instead of a correct/edited translation, since the human-in-the-loop might be a user looking for a translation, but not be able to provide one. To tackle the challenge of deciding whether each incoming pair source-translations is worthy to query for human feedback, we resort to a number of stream-based active learning query strategies. Moreover, since we not know in advance which query strategy will be the most adequate for a certain language pair and set of Machine Translation models, we propose to dynamically combine multiple strategies using prediction with expert advice. Our experiments show that using active learning allows to converge to the best Machine Translation systems with fewer human interactions. Furthermore, combining multiple strategies using prediction with expert advice often outperforms several individual active learning strategies with even fewer interactions.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 99 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Mar 2022.

Builds on

29 of 99 references.

References · 29

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  3. 2018A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scorescited by 1,799
  4. 2016Enriching Word Vectors with Subword Informationcited by 1,583
  5. 2020COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluationcited by 1,033
  6. 2021Experts, Errors, and Context: A Large-Scale Study of Human Evaluation for Machine Translationcited by 338
  7. 2018Online Learning: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 205
  8. 2019Facebook FAIR's WMT19 News Translation Task Submissioncited by 179
  9. 2020Automatic Machine Translation Evaluation in Many Languages via Zero-Shot Paraphrasingcited by 115
  10. 2017Learning Active Learning from Datacited by 101
  11. 2017Learning how to Active Learn: A Deep Reinforcement Learning Approachcited by 79
  12. 2017Reinforcement Learning for Bandit Neural Machine Translation with Simulated Human Feedbackcited by 72
17 more
  1. 2018Practical Obstacles to Deploying Active Learningcited by 68
  2. 2019Microsoft Translator at WMT 2019: Towards Large-Scale Document-Level Neural Machine Translationcited by 56
  3. 2017ParaNMT-50M: Pushing the Limits of Paraphrastic Sentence Embeddings with Millions of Machine Translationscited by 44
  4. 2018Active Learning for Interactive Neural Machine Translation of Data Streamscited by 21
  5. 2019The University of Edinburgh's Submissions to the WMT19 News Translation Taskcited by 11
  6. 2020WeChat Neural Machine Translation Systems for WMT20cited by 11
  7. 2019Microsoft Research Asia's Systems for WMT19cited by 10
  8. 2018Online Learning for Effort Reduction in Interactive Neural Machine Translationcited by 9
  9. 2018A Reinforcement Learning Approach to Interactive-Predictive Neural Machine Translationcited by 8
  10. 2018Dynamic Ensemble Active Learning: A Non-Stationary Bandit with Expert Advicecited by 7
  11. 2020The Volctrans Machine Translation System for WMT20cited by 7
  12. 2021Online Learning Meets Machine Translation Evaluation: Finding the Best Systems with the Least Human Effortcited by 7
  13. 2017A Shared Task on Bandit Learning for Machine Translationcited by 6
  14. 2021Active2 Learning: Actively reducing redundancies in Active Learning methods for Sequence Tagging and Machine Translationcited by 6
  15. 2016Can Active Learning Experience Be Transferred?cited by 5
  16. 2017A User-Study on Online Adaptation of Neural Machine Translation to Human Post-Editscited by 5
  17. 2020Machine Translation System Selection from Bandit Feedbackcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 2.

5 papers.