Active2 Learning: Actively reducing redundancies in Active Learning methods for Sequence Tagging and Machine Translation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
While deep learning is a powerful tool for natural language processing (NLP) problems, successful solutions to these problems rely heavily on large amounts of annotated samples. However, manually annotating data is expensive and time-consuming. Active Learning (AL) strategies reduce the need for huge volumes of labeled data by iteratively selecting a small number of examples for manual annotation based on their estimated utility in training the given model. In this paper, we argue that since AL strategies choose examples independently, they may potentially select similar examples, all of which may not contribute significantly to the learning process. Our proposed approach, Active2 Learning (A2L), actively adapts to the deep learning model being trained to eliminate further such redundant examples chosen by an AL strategy. We show that A2L is widely applicable by using it in conjunction with several different AL strategies and NLP tasks. We empirically demonstrate that the proposed approach is further able to reduce the data requirements of state-of-the-art AL strategies by an absolute percentage reduction of ≈3-25% on multiple NLP tasks while achieving the same performance with no additional computation overhead.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Mar 2021.
Builds on
14 of 54 references.
References · 14
- 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,530
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
- 2014Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networkscited by 2,974
- 2014On the Properties of Neural Machine Translation: Encoder-Decoder Approachescited by 1,303
- 2015Weight Uncertainty in Neural Networkscited by 554
- 2016Neural Architectures for Named Entity Recognitioncited by 548
- 2017Supervised Learning of Universal Sentence Representations from Natural Language Inference Datacited by 428
- 2015A Theoretically Grounded Application of Dropout in Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 161
- 2016Modeling Coverage for Neural Machine Translationcited by 110
- 2017Deep Active Learning for Named Entity Recognitioncited by 108
- 2018Deep Bayesian Active Learning for Natural Language Processing: Results of a Large-Scale Empirical Studycited by 90
- 2016When is multitask learning effective? Semantic sequence prediction under varying data conditionscited by 21
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 3.
6 papers.
- 2022A Survey of Active Learning for Natural Language Processingcited by 40
- 2022Onception: Active Learning with Expert Advice for Real World Machine Translationcited by 5
- 2023Towards Selection of Text-to-speech Data to Augment ASR Trainingcited by 5
- 2022Impact of Stop Sets on Stopping Active Learning for Text Classificationcited by 2
- 2023KPI Extraction from Maintenance Work Orders -- A Comparison of Expert Labeling, Text Classification and AI-Assisted Tagging for Computing Failure Rates of Wind Turbinescited by 2
- 2023Actively Discovering New Slots for Task-oriented Conversationcited by 0
- 2023KPI Extraction from Maintenance Work Orders -- A Comparison of Expert Labeling, Text Classification and AI-Assisted Tagging for Computing Failure Rates of Wind Turbines7 Nov 2023
- 2023Towards Selection of Text-to-speech Data to Augment ASR Training30 May 2023
- 2023Actively Discovering New Slots for Task-oriented Conversation6 May 2023
- 2022A Survey of Active Learning for Natural Language Processing18 Oct 2022
- 2022Onception: Active Learning with Expert Advice for Real World Machine Translation9 Mar 2022
- 2022Impact of Stop Sets on Stopping Active Learning for Text Classification8 Jan 2022