mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Heavy Hitters and the Structure of Local Privacy

arXiv 1711.04740 ↗First posted 13 Nov 2017cs.DScited by 20

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We present a new locally differentially private algorithm for the heavy hitters problem which achieves optimal worst-case error as a function of all standardly considered parameters. Prior work obtained error rates which depend optimally on the number of users, the size of the domain, and the privacy parameter, but depend sub-optimally on the failure probability. We strengthen existing lower bounds on the error to incorporate the failure probability, and show that our new upper bound is tight with respect to this parameter as well. Our lower bound is based on a new understanding of the structure of locally private protocols. We further develop these ideas to obtain the following general results beyond heavy hitters. bullet Advanced Grouposition: In the local model, group privacy for k users degrades proportionally to ≈ √k, instead of linearly in k as in the central model. Stronger group privacy yields improved max-information guarantees, as well as stronger lower bounds (via "packing arguments"), over the central model. bullet Building on a transformation of Bassily and Smith (STOC 2015), we give a generic transformation from any non-interactive approximate-private local protocol into a pure-private local protocol. Again in contrast with the central model, this shows that we cannot obtain more accurate algorithms by moving from pure to approximate local privacy.

Key facts. Cited by 20 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 13 Nov 2017.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 13 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 6; 2022: 4; 2023: 6; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

20 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2021Lossless Compression of Efficient Private Local Randomizerscited by 27
  2. 2021Differentially Private Multi-Armed Bandits in the Shuffle Modelcited by 24
  3. 2022Constant matters: Fine-grained Complexity of Differentially Private Continual Observationcited by 23
  4. 2021Optimal Compression of Locally Differentially Private Mechanismscited by 22
  5. 2023Privacy Amplification via Compression: Achieving the Optimal Privacy-Accuracy-Communication Trade-off in Distributed Mean Estimationcited by 22
  6. 2021Towards Sparse Federated Analytics: Location Heatmaps under Distributed Differential Privacy with Secure Aggregationcited by 10
  7. 2022Private Frequency Estimation via Projective Geometrycited by 9
  8. 2023On Differential Privacy and Adaptive Data Analysis with Bounded Spacecited by 9
  9. 2024Universal Exact Compression of Differentially Private Mechanismscited by 8
  10. 2023Optimal Unbiased Randomizers for Regression with Label Differential Privacycited by 6
  11. 2021Breaking The Dimension Dependence in Sparse Distribution Estimation under Communication Constraintscited by 4
  12. 2022Algorithms with More Granular Differential Privacy Guaranteescited by 4
8 more
  1. 2023Improved Analysis of Sparse Linear Regression in Local Differential Privacy Modelcited by 4
  2. 2023Sample-Optimal Locally Private Hypothesis Selection and the Provable Benefits of Interactivitycited by 3
  3. 2021Differentially Private Algorithms for Clustering with Stability Assumptionscited by 1
  4. 2022On PAC Learning Halfspaces in Non-interactive Local Privacy Model with Public Unlabeled Datacited by 1
  5. 2023Training generative models from privatized datacited by 1
  6. 2026Differentially Private Auditing Under Strategic Responsecited by 1
  7. 2025A Locally Differential Private Coding-Assisted Succinct Histogram Protocolcited by 0
  8. 2025DP-Hype: Federated Differentially Private Hyperparameter Searchcited by 0