Data-driven Rank Breaking for Efficient Rank Aggregation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Rank aggregation systems collect ordinal preferences from individuals to produce a global ranking that represents the social preference. Rank-breaking is a common practice to reduce the computational complexity of learning the global ranking. The individual preferences are broken into pairwise comparisons and applied to efficient algorithms tailored for independent paired comparisons. However, due to the ignored dependencies in the data, naive rank-breaking approaches can result in inconsistent estimates. The key idea to produce accurate and consistent estimates is to treat the pairwise comparisons unequally, depending on the topology of the collected data. In this paper, we provide the optimal rank-breaking estimator, which not only achieves consistency but also achieves the best error bound. This allows us to characterize the fundamental tradeoff between accuracy and complexity. Further, the analysis identifies how the accuracy depends on the spectral gap of a corresponding comparison graph.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 21 Jan 2016.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 3; 2023: 0; 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
10 papers.
- 2024Feel-Good Thompson Sampling for Contextual Dueling Banditscited by 23
- 2022Exploiting Correlation to Achieve Faster Learning Rates in Low-Rank Preference Banditscited by 11
- 2022On the identifiability of mixtures of ranking modelscited by 7
- 2025LLM Routing with Dueling Feedbackcited by 6
- 2022Dueling Convex Optimization with General Preferencescited by 5
- 2024Stop Relying on No-Choice and Do not Repeat the Moves: Optimal, Efficient and Practical Algorithms for Assortment Optimizationcited by 3
- 2025Preference-based Reinforcement Learning beyond Pairwise Comparisons: Benefits of Multiple Optionscited by 2
- 2021Fast Learning of MNL Model from General Partial Rankings with Application to Network Formation Modelingcited by 1
- 2024Fair Active Ranking from Pairwise Preferencescited by 0
- 2026Optimal Top-k Identification from Pairwise Comparisonscited by 0
- 2026Optimal Top-k Identification from Pairwise Comparisons9 Jul 2026
- 2025Preference-based Reinforcement Learning beyond Pairwise Comparisons: Benefits of Multiple Options21 Oct 2025
- 2025LLM Routing with Dueling Feedback1 Oct 2025
- 2024Feel-Good Thompson Sampling for Contextual Dueling Bandits9 Apr 2024
- 2024Stop Relying on No-Choice and Do not Repeat the Moves: Optimal, Efficient and Practical Algorithms for Assortment Optimization29 Feb 2024
- 2024Fair Active Ranking from Pairwise Preferences5 Feb 2024
- 2022Dueling Convex Optimization with General Preferences27 Sep 2022
- 2022Exploiting Correlation to Achieve Faster Learning Rates in Low-Rank Preference Bandits23 Feb 2022
- 2022On the identifiability of mixtures of ranking models31 Jan 2022
- 2021Fast Learning of MNL Model from General Partial Rankings with Application to Network Formation Modeling31 Dec 2021