mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Introducing the Expohedron for Efficient Pareto-optimal Fairness-Utility Amortizations in Repeated Rankings

arXiv 2202.03237 ↗First posted 7 Feb 2022cs.IR cs.LGcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We consider the problem of computing a sequence of rankings that maximizes consumer-side utility while minimizing producer-side individual unfairness of exposure. While prior work has addressed this problem using linear or quadratic programs on bistochastic matrices, such approaches, relying on Birkhoff-von Neumann (BvN) decompositions, are too slow to be implemented at large scale. In this paper we introduce a geometrical object, a polytope that we call expohedron, whose points represent all achievable exposures of items for a Position Based Model (PBM). We exhibit some of its properties and lay out a Carath'eodory decomposition algorithm with complexity O(n2log(n)) able to express any point inside the expohedron as a convex sum of at most n vertices, where n is the number of items to rank. Such a decomposition makes it possible to express any feasible target exposure as a distribution over at most n rankings. Furthermore we show that we can use this polytope to recover the whole Pareto frontier of the multi-objective fairness-utility optimization problem, using a simple geometrical procedure with complexity O(n2log(n)). Our approach compares favorably to linear or quadratic programming baselines in terms of algorithmic complexity and empirical runtime and is applicable to any merit that is a non-decreasing function of item relevance. Furthermore our solution can be expressed as a distribution over only n permutations, instead of the (n-1)2 + 1 achieved with BvN decompositions. We perform experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets, confirming our theoretical results.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Feb 2022.

Builds on

19 of 48 references.

References · 19

  1. 2018Fairness of Exposure in Rankingscited by 189
  2. 2019Fairness-Aware Ranking in Search & Recommendation Systems with Application to LinkedIn Talent Searchcited by 137
  3. 2018Equity of Attention: Amortizing Individual Fairness in Rankingscited by 124
  4. 2013Introducing LETOR 4.0 Datasetscited by 120
  5. 2017FA*IR: A Fair Top-k Ranking Algorithmcited by 113
  6. 2019Policy Learning for Fairness in Rankingcited by 74
  7. 2020Controlling Fairness and Bias in Dynamic Learning-to-Rankcited by 67
  8. 2021Fairness in Rankings and Recommendations: An Overviewcited by 62
  9. 2019Pairwise Fairness for Ranking and Regressioncited by 58
  10. 2020Evaluating Stochastic Rankings with Expected Exposurecited by 53
  11. 2021Fairness of Exposure in Stochastic Banditscited by 42
  12. 2021Computationally Efficient Optimization of Plackett-Luce Ranking Models for Relevance and Fairnesscited by 35
7 more
  1. 2018Reducing Disparate Exposure in Ranking: A Learning To Rank Approachcited by 33
  2. 2021TFROM: A Two-sided Fairness-Aware Recommendation Model for Both Customers and Providerscited by 31
  3. 2021Fairness in Ranking under Uncertaintycited by 27
  4. 2020User Fairness, Item Fairness, and Diversity for Rankings in Two-Sided Marketscited by 23
  5. 2021Online certification of preference-based fairness for personalized recommender systemscited by 22
  6. 2021Optimizing Rankings for Recommendation in Matching Marketscited by 12
  7. 2021Overview of the TREC 2020 Fair Ranking Trackcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 5; 2023: 3; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.

11 papers.