mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Reducing Disparate Exposure in Ranking: A Learning To Rank Approach

arXiv 1805.08716 ↗First posted 22 May 2018cs.IR cs.CYcited by 33

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Ranked search results have become the main mechanism by which we find content, products, places, and people online. Thus their ordering contributes not only to the satisfaction of the searcher, but also to career and business opportunities, educational placement, and even social success of those being ranked. Researchers have become increasingly concerned with systematic biases in data-driven ranking models, and various post-processing methods have been proposed to mitigate discrimination and inequality of opportunity. This approach, however, has the disadvantage that it still allows an unfair ranking model to be trained. In this paper we explore a new in-processing approach: DELTR, a learning-to-rank framework that addresses potential issues of discrimination and unequal opportunity in rankings at training time. We measure these problems in terms of discrepancies in the average group exposure and design a ranker that optimizes search results in terms of relevance and in terms of reducing such discrepancies. We perform an extensive experimental study showing that being "colorblind" can be among the best or the worst choices from the perspective of relevance and exposure, depending on how much and which kind of bias is present in the training set. We show that our in-processing method performs better in terms of relevance and exposure than a pre-processing and a post-processing method across all tested scenarios.

Key facts. Cited by 33 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 22 May 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 6; 2022: 8; 2023: 2; 2024: 7; 2025: 8; 2026: 2.

33 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021Societal Biases in Retrieved Contents: Measurement Framework and Adversarial Mitigation for BERT Rankerscited by 35
  2. 2021TFROM: A Two-sided Fairness-Aware Recommendation Model for Both Customers and Providerscited by 31
  3. 2022Fairness in Recommendation: Foundations, Methods and Applicationscited by 27
  4. 2021End-to-end Learning for Fair Ranking Systemscited by 18
  5. 2022Fair Ranking with Noisy Protected Attributescited by 17
  6. 2024Do Large Language Models Rank Fairly? An Empirical Study on the Fairness of LLMs as Rankerscited by 17
  7. 2022Optimizing generalized Gini indices for fairness in rankingscited by 13
  8. 2022Introducing the Expohedron for Efficient Pareto-optimal Fairness-Utility Amortizations in Repeated Rankingscited by 11
  9. 2021Fairness Through Regularization for Learning to Rankcited by 8
  10. 2021Fairness for Robust Learning to Rankcited by 6
  11. 202410 Years of Fair Representations: Challenges and Opportunitiescited by 6
  12. 2022Debiasing Neural Retrieval via In-batch Balancing Regularizationcited by 5
21 more
  1. 2025Bias-Aware Agent: Enhancing Fairness in AI-Driven Knowledge Retrievalcited by 5
  2. 2025Why Multi-Interest Fairness Matters: Hypergraph Contrastive Multi-Interest Learning for Fair Conversational Recommender Systemcited by 5
  3. 2022Invariant Representations with Stochastically Quantized Neural Networkscited by 4
  4. 2023Fairness in Ranking under Disparate Uncertaintycited by 4
  5. 2024Measuring Bias in a Ranked List using Term-based Representationscited by 4
  6. 2021A Pre-processing Method for Fairness in Rankingcited by 3
  7. 2024Performative Debias with Fair-exposure Optimization Driven by Strategic Agents in Recommender Systemscited by 3
  8. 2022Contextual bandits with concave rewards, and an application to fair rankingcited by 2
  9. 2025Efficient and Responsible Adaptation of Large Language Models for Robust and Equitable Top-k Recommendationscited by 2
  10. 2025Breaking the Dyadic Barrier: Rethinking Fairness in Link Prediction Beyond Demographic Paritycited by 2
  11. 2024MOReGIn: Multi-Objective Recommendation at the Global and Individual Levelscited by 1
  12. 2024Learning Fair Ranking Policies via Differentiable Optimization of Ordered Weighted Averagescited by 1
  13. 2025What's in a Query: Polarity-Aware Distribution-Based Fair Rankingcited by 1
  14. 2025Bias Mitigation Agent: Optimizing Source Selection for Fair and Balanced Knowledge Retrievalcited by 1
  15. 2022Towards User-Centered Metrics for Trustworthy AI in Immersive Cyberspacecited by 0
  16. 2023Learning to Re-rank with Constrained Meta-Optimal Transportcited by 0
  17. 2024End-to-End Optimization and Learning of Fair Court Schedulescited by 0
  18. 2025Fairness-in-the-Workflow: How Machine Learning Practitioners at Big Tech Companies Approach Fairness in Recommender Systemscited by 0
  19. 2025Learning to Rank with Top-K Fairnesscited by 0
  20. 2026Trade-offs Between Individual and Group Fairness in Machine Learning: A Comprehensive Reviewcited by 0
  21. 2026Fairness-Aware Retrieval Optimization for Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 0