mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Sampling Ex-Post Group-Fair Rankings

arXiv 2203.00887 ↗First posted 2 Mar 2022cs.LG cs.DScited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Randomized rankings have been of recent interest to achieve ex-ante fairer exposure and better robustness than deterministic rankings. We propose a set of natural axioms for randomized group-fair rankings and prove that there exists a unique distribution D that satisfies our axioms and is supported only over ex-post group-fair rankings, i.e., rankings that satisfy given lower and upper bounds on group-wise representation in the top-k ranks. Our problem formulation works even when there is implicit bias, incomplete relevance information, or only ordinal ranking is available instead of relevance scores or utility values. We propose two algorithms to sample a random group-fair ranking from the distribution D mentioned above. Our first dynamic programming-based algorithm samples ex-post group-fair rankings uniformly at random in time O(k2ℓ), where ℓ is the number of groups. Our second random walk-based algorithm samples ex-post group-fair rankings from a distribution δ-close to D in total variation distance and has expected running time O^*(k2ℓ2), when there is a sufficient gap between the given upper and lower bounds on the group-wise representation. The former does exact sampling, but the latter runs significantly faster on real-world data sets for larger values of k. We give empirical evidence that our algorithms compare favorably against recent baselines for fairness and ranking utility on real-world data sets.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Mar 2022.

Builds on

17 of 61 references.

References · 17

  1. 2018Fairness of Exposure in Rankingscited by 189
  2. 2018Fair Clustering Through Fairletscited by 176
  3. 2019Fairness-Aware Ranking in Search & Recommendation Systems with Application to LinkedIn Talent Searchcited by 137
  4. 2019Fairness in Recommendation Ranking through Pairwise Comparisonscited by 127
  5. 2018Equity of Attention: Amortizing Individual Fairness in Rankingscited by 124
  6. 2017FA*IR: A Fair Top-k Ranking Algorithmcited by 113
  7. 2016Measuring Fairness in Ranked Outputscited by 81
  8. 2017Ranking with Fairness Constraintscited by 78
  9. 2019Pairwise Fairness for Ranking and Regressioncited by 58
  10. 2020Evaluating Stochastic Rankings with Expected Exposurecited by 53
  11. 2018Fair and Diverse DPP-based Data Summarizationcited by 39
  12. 2022Sampling with Riemannian Hamiltonian Monte Carlo in a Constrained Spacecited by 28
5 more
  1. 2020Interventions for Ranking in the Presence of Implicit Biascited by 27
  2. 2021Fairness in Ranking under Uncertaintycited by 27
  3. 2018On Discrimination Discovery and Removal in Ranked Data using Causal Graphcited by 16
  4. 2022Introducing the Expohedron for Efficient Pareto-optimal Fairness-Utility Amortizations in Repeated Rankingscited by 11
  5. 2021Fairness for Robust Learning to Rankcited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.