mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Towards Efficient Pareto-optimal Utility-Fairness between Groups in Repeated Rankings

arXiv 2402.14305 ↗First posted 22 Feb 2024cs.IR cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we tackle the problem of computing a sequence of rankings with the guarantee of the Pareto-optimal balance between (1) maximizing the utility of the consumers and (2) minimizing unfairness between producers of the items. Such a multi-objective optimization problem is typically solved using a combination of a scalarization method and linear programming on bi-stochastic matrices, representing the distribution of possible rankings of items. However, the above-mentioned approach relies on Birkhoff-von Neumann (BvN) decomposition, of which the computational complexity is O(n5) with n being the number of items, making it impractical for large-scale systems. To address this drawback, we introduce a novel approach to the above problem by using the Expohedron - a permutahedron whose points represent all achievable exposures of items. On the Expohedron, we profile the Pareto curve which captures the trade-off between group fairness and user utility by identifying a finite number of Pareto optimal solutions. We further propose an efficient method by relaxing our optimization problem on the Expohedron's circumscribed n-sphere, which significantly improve the running time. Moreover, the approximate Pareto curve is asymptotically close to the real Pareto optimal curve as the number of substantial solutions increases. Our methods are applicable with different ranking merits that are non-decreasing functions of item relevance. The effectiveness of our methods are validated through experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Feb 2024.

Builds on

18 of 51 references.

References · 18

  1. 2020DCN V2: Improved Deep & Cross Network and Practical Lessons for Web-scale Learning to Rank Systemscited by 326
  2. 2018Fairness of Exposure in Rankingscited by 189
  3. 2017A Rewriting System for Convex Optimization Problemscited by 178
  4. 2019Fairness-Aware Ranking in Search & Recommendation Systems with Application to LinkedIn Talent Searchcited by 137
  5. 2018Equity of Attention: Amortizing Individual Fairness in Rankingscited by 124
  6. 2013Introducing LETOR 4.0 Datasetscited by 120
  7. 2021Towards Long-term Fairness in Recommendationcited by 77
  8. 2020Evaluating Stochastic Rankings with Expected Exposurecited by 53
  9. 2022Toward Pareto Efficient Fairness-Utility Trade-off inRecommendation through Reinforcement Learningcited by 29
  10. 2020User Fairness, Item Fairness, and Diversity for Rankings in Two-Sided Marketscited by 23
  11. 2021Online certification of preference-based fairness for personalized recommender systemscited by 22
  12. 2022The Unfairness of Popularity Bias in Book Recommendationcited by 14
6 more
  1. 2021Optimizing Rankings for Recommendation in Matching Marketscited by 12
  2. 2022Introducing the Expohedron for Efficient Pareto-optimal Fairness-Utility Amortizations in Repeated Rankingscited by 11
  3. 2023Pareto-based Multi-Objective Recommender System with Forgetting Curvecited by 7
  4. 2019Capuchin: Causal Database Repair for Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 6
  5. 2023Provider Fairness and Beyond-Accuracy Trade-offs in Recommender Systemscited by 6
  6. 2021Overview of the TREC 2020 Fair Ranking Trackcited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.