mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Explainability in Music Recommender Systems

arXiv 2201.10528 ↗First posted 25 Jan 2022cs.LGcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The most common way to listen to recorded music nowadays is via streaming platforms which provide access to tens of millions of tracks. To assist users in effectively browsing these large catalogs, the integration of Music Recommender Systems (MRSs) has become essential. Current real-world MRSs are often quite complex and optimized for recommendation accuracy. They combine several building blocks based on collaborative filtering and content-based recommendation. This complexity can hinder the ability to explain recommendations to end users, which is particularly important for recommendations perceived as unexpected or inappropriate. While pure recommendation performance often correlates with user satisfaction, explainability has a positive impact on other factors such as trust and forgiveness, which are ultimately essential to maintain user loyalty. In this article, we discuss how explainability can be addressed in the context of MRSs. We provide perspectives on how explainability could improve music recommendation algorithms and enhance user experience. First, we review common dimensions and goals of recommenders' explainability and in general of eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), and elaborate on the extent to which these apply -- or need to be adapted -- to the specific characteristics of music consumption and recommendation. Then, we show how explainability components can be integrated within a MRS and in what form explanations can be provided. Since the evaluation of explanation quality is decoupled from pure accuracy-based evaluation criteria, we also discuss requirements and strategies for evaluating explanations of music recommendations. Finally, we describe the current challenges for introducing explainability within a large-scale industrial music recommender system and provide research perspectives.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 53 of its 123 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jan 2022.

Builds on

53 of 123 references.

References · 53

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  2. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  3. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
  4. 2014Conditional Generative Adversarial Netscited by 2,152
  5. 2016node2vec: Scalable Feature Learning for Networkscited by 1,913
  6. 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,543
  7. 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,400
  8. 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,309
  9. 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,201
  10. 2018Self-Attentive Sequential Recommendationcited by 1,169
  11. 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,149
  12. 2018Graph Convolutional Neural Networks for Web-Scale Recommender Systemscited by 1,133
38 more
  1. 2017Neural Collaborative Filteringcited by 1,108
  2. 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,086
  3. 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 970
  4. 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 802
  5. 2016The Mythos of Model Interpretabilitycited by 716
  6. 2020A Survey on Knowledge Graphs: Representation, Acquisition and Applicationscited by 643
  7. 2020Jukebox: A Generative Model for Musiccited by 535
  8. 2018Explaining Explanations: An Overview of Interpretability of Machine Learningcited by 508
  9. 2019Is Attention Interpretable?cited by 387
  10. 2019The many Shapley values for model explanationcited by 341
  11. 2017The (Un)reliability of saliency methodscited by 331
  12. 2018Actionable Recourse in Linear Classificationcited by 327
  13. 2018On the Robustness of Interpretability Methodscited by 310
  14. 2018Variational Autoencoders for Collaborative Filteringcited by 308
  15. 2018Manipulating and Measuring Model Interpretabilitycited by 256
  16. 2018Learning to Explain: An Information-Theoretic Perspective on Model Interpretationcited by 248
  17. 2020Concept Whitening for Interpretable Image Recognitioncited by 225
  18. 2019Explanations can be manipulated and geometry is to blamecited by 215
  19. 2018Explainable Recommendation: A Survey and New Perspectivescited by 210
  20. 2020Problems with Shapley-value-based explanations as feature importance measurescited by 198
  21. 2016Generating Visual Explanationscited by 156
  22. 2018RSA: Byzantine-Robust Stochastic Aggregation Methods for Distributed Learning from Heterogeneous Datasetscited by 148
  23. 2020True to the Model or True to the Data?cited by 123
  24. 2019Asymmetric Shapley values: incorporating causal knowledge into model-agnostic explainabilitycited by 114
  25. 2020A systematic review and taxonomy of explanations in decision support and recommender systemscited by 45
  26. 2017Current Challenges and Visions in Music Recommender Systems Researchcited by 42
  27. 2018Explainable Recommendation via Multi-Task Learning in Opinionated Text Datacited by 40
  28. 2019Gravity-Inspired Graph Autoencoders for Directed Link Predictioncited by 28
  29. 2017End-to-end learning for music audio tagging at scalecited by 25
  30. 2020Carousel Personalization in Music Streaming Apps with Contextual Banditscited by 25
  31. 2017Automatic Generation of Natural Language Explanationscited by 22
  32. 2020Feature Removal Is a Unifying Principle for Model Explanation Methodscited by 21
  33. 2020Disentangled Multidimensional Metric Learning for Music Similaritycited by 16
  34. 2020Challenging common interpretability assumptions in feature attribution explanationscited by 11
  35. 2013Do Social Explanations Work? Studying and Modeling the Effects of Social Explanations in Recommender Systemscited by 10
  36. 2018An Analysis of Approaches Taken in the ACM RecSys Challenge 2018 for Automatic Music Playlist Continuationcited by 9
  37. 2018A data-driven approach to mid-level perceptual musical feature modelingcited by 8
  38. 2018Natural Language Processing for Music Knowledge Discoverycited by 6

50 most cited of 53 All 53 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 4; 2024: 2; 2025: 6; 2026: 1.

15 papers.

Sort: