mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Fairness Field Guide: Perspectives from Social and Formal Sciences

arXiv 2201.05216 ↗First posted 13 Jan 2022cs.AI cs.CY cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Over the past several years, a slew of different methods to measure the fairness of a machine learning model have been proposed. However, despite the growing number of publications and implementations, there is still a critical lack of literature that explains the interplay of fair machine learning with the social sciences of philosophy, sociology, and law. We hope to remedy this issue by accumulating and expounding upon the thoughts and discussions of fair machine learning produced by both social and formal (specifically machine learning and statistics) sciences in this field guide. Specifically, in addition to giving the mathematical and algorithmic backgrounds of several popular statistical and causal-based fair machine learning methods, we explain the underlying philosophical and legal thoughts that support them. Further, we explore several criticisms of the current approaches to fair machine learning from sociological and philosophical viewpoints. It is our hope that this field guide will help fair machine learning practitioners better understand how their algorithms align with important humanistic values (such as fairness) and how we can, as a field, design methods and metrics to better serve oppressed and marginalized populaces.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 43 of its 118 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jan 2022.

Builds on

43 of 118 references.

References · 43

  1. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  2. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  3. 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 802
  4. 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
  5. 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 671
  6. 2016Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scorescited by 582
  7. 2017Algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairnesscited by 402
  8. 2020Fairness in Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 369
  9. 2018AI Fairness 360: An Extensible Toolkit for Detecting, Understanding, and Mitigating Unwanted Algorithmic Biascited by 319
  10. 2017Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Artcited by 315
  11. 2013Direct and Indirect Effectscited by 276
  12. 2020A Survey on Causal Inferencecited by 202
31 more
  1. 2020Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 194
  2. 2017Avoiding Discrimination through Causal Reasoningcited by 191
  3. 2018Path-Specific Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 179
  4. 2016Fairness in Learning: Classic and Contextual Banditscited by 167
  5. 2017Fairness in Machine Learning: Lessons from Political Philosophycited by 148
  6. 2020Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 143
  7. 2018The Frontiers of Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 139
  8. 2018An Intersectional Definition of Fairnesscited by 126
  9. 2019On the Apparent Conflict Between Individual and Group Fairnesscited by 126
  10. 2019Towards a Critical Race Methodology in Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 124
  11. 2014Automated Experiments on Ad Privacy Settings: A Tale of Opacity, Choice, and Discriminationcited by 83
  12. 2018Differentially Private Fair Learningcited by 76
  13. 2016A causal framework for discovering and removing direct and indirect discriminationcited by 71
  14. 2019PC-Fairness: A Unified Framework for Measuring Causality-based Fairnesscited by 67
  15. 2017On Formalizing Fairness in Prediction with Machine Learningcited by 65
  16. 2018iFair: Learning Individually Fair Data Representations for Algorithmic Decision Makingcited by 64
  17. 2018A Moral Framework for Understanding of Fair ML through Economic Models of Equality of Opportunitycited by 53
  18. 2020Survey on Causal-based Machine Learning Fairness Notionscited by 53
  19. 2021The Use and Misuse of Counterfactuals in Ethical Machine Learningcited by 52
  20. 2018How Do Fairness Definitions Fare? Examining Public Attitudes Towards Algorithmic Definitions of Fairnesscited by 48
  21. 2018Racial categories in machine learningcited by 48
  22. 2020What's Sex Got To Do With Fair Machine Learning?cited by 37
  23. 2019Fairness in Algorithmic Decision Making: An Excursion Through the Lens of Causalitycited by 33
  24. 2020On the Moral Justification of Statistical Paritycited by 30
  25. 2019Counterfactual Reasoning for Fair Clinical Risk Predictioncited by 28
  26. 2019A Potential Outcomes Calculus for Identifying Conditional Path-Specific Effectscited by 19
  27. 2019On the Legal Compatibility of Fairness Definitionscited by 19
  28. 2019Fairness through Equality of Effortcited by 15
  29. 2021Black Feminist Musings on Algorithmic Oppressioncited by 11
  30. 2021An Introduction to Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 4
  31. 2021Fairness as Equality of Opportunity: Normative Guidance from Political Philosophycited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 2.

3 papers.