Black Feminist Musings on Algorithmic Oppression
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper unapologetically reflects on the critical role that Black feminism can and should play in abolishing algorithmic oppression. Positioning algorithmic oppression in the broader field of feminist science and technology studies, I draw upon feminist philosophical critiques of science and technology and discuss histories and continuities of scientific oppression against historically marginalized people. Moreover, I examine the concepts of invisibility and hypervisibility in oppressive technologies a l'a the canonical double bind. Furthermore, I discuss what it means to call for diversity as a solution to algorithmic violence, and I critique dialectics of the fairness, accountability, and transparency community. I end by inviting you to envision and imagine the struggle to abolish algorithmic oppression by abolishing oppressive systems and shifting algorithmic development practices, including engaging our communities in scientific processes, centering marginalized communities in design, and consensual data and algorithmic practices.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jan 2021.
Builds on
4 of 40 references.
References · 4
- 2020Decolonial AI: Decolonial Theory as Sociotechnical Foresight in Artificial Intelligencecited by 100
- 2019Roles for Computing in Social Changecited by 49
- 2019Algorithmic Injustices: Towards a Relational Ethicscited by 11
- 2019Oxford Handbook on AI Ethics Book Chapter on Race and Gendercited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 4; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
11 papers.
- 2021Ethical and social risks of harm from Language Modelscited by 957
- 2023Factoring the Matrix of Domination: A Critical Review and Reimagination of Intersectionality in AI Fairnesscited by 26
- 2022Rethinking Fairness: An Interdisciplinary Survey of Critiques of Hegemonic ML Fairness Approachescited by 23
- 2023`It is currently hodgepodge'': Examining AI/ML Practitioners' Challenges during Co-production of Responsible AI Valuescited by 18
- 2022The Algorithmic Imprintcited by 10
- 2024Data Feminism for AIcited by 6
- 2022Definition drives design: Disability models and mechanisms of bias in AI technologiescited by 5
- 2022The Fairness Field Guide: Perspectives from Social and Formal Sciencescited by 3
- 2025Toward Substantive Intersectional Algorithmic Fairness: Desiderata for a Feminist Approachcited by 0
- 2025Who Owns The Robot?: Four Ethical and Socio-technical Questions about Wellbeing Robots in the Real World through Community Engagementcited by 0
- 2026Abstracted Away: Resisting Alienation and Ungrounded Abstraction in AI Research Communitiescited by 0
- 2026Abstracted Away: Resisting Alienation and Ungrounded Abstraction in AI Research Communities9 Aug 2026
- 2025Who Owns The Robot?: Four Ethical and Socio-technical Questions about Wellbeing Robots in the Real World through Community Engagement1 Sep 2025
- 2025Toward Substantive Intersectional Algorithmic Fairness: Desiderata for a Feminist Approach25 Aug 2025
- 2024Data Feminism for AI2 May 2024
- 2023`It is currently hodgepodge'': Examining AI/ML Practitioners' Challenges during Co-production of Responsible AI Values14 Jul 2023
- 2023Factoring the Matrix of Domination: A Critical Review and Reimagination of Intersectionality in AI Fairness16 Mar 2023
- 2022Definition drives design: Disability models and mechanisms of bias in AI technologies16 Jun 2022
- 2022The Algorithmic Imprint3 Jun 2022
- 2022Rethinking Fairness: An Interdisciplinary Survey of Critiques of Hegemonic ML Fairness Approaches6 May 2022
- 2022The Fairness Field Guide: Perspectives from Social and Formal Sciences13 Jan 2022
- 2021Ethical and social risks of harm from Language Models8 Dec 2021