mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Negative Evidence Matters in Interpretable Histology Image Classification

arXiv 2201.02445 ↗First posted 7 Jan 2022eess.IV cs.CV cs.LGcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Using only global image-class labels, weakly-supervised learning methods, such as class activation mapping, allow training CNNs to jointly classify an image, and locate regions of interest associated with the predicted class. However, without any guidance at the pixel level, such methods may yield inaccurate regions. This problem is known to be more challenging with histology images than with natural ones, since objects are less salient, structures have more variations, and foreground and background regions have stronger similarities. Therefore, computer vision methods for visual interpretation of CNNs may not directly apply. In this paper, a simple yet efficient method based on a composite loss is proposed to learn information from the fully negative samples (i.e., samples without positive regions), and thereby reduce false positives/negatives. Our new loss function contains two complementary terms: the first exploits positive evidence collected from the CNN classifier, while the second leverages the fully negative samples from training data. In particular, a pre-trained CNN is equipped with a decoder that allows refining the regions of interest. The CNN is exploited to collect both positive and negative evidence at the pixel level to train the decoder. Our method called NEGEV benefits from the fully negative samples that naturally occur in the data, without any additional supervision signals beyond image-class labels. Extensive experiments show that our proposed method can substantial outperform related state-of-art methods on GlaS (public benchmark for colon cancer), and Camelyon16 (patch-based benchmark for breast cancer using three different backbones). Our results highlight the benefits of using both positive and negative evidence, the first obtained from a classifier, and the other naturally available in datasets.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 66 of its 104 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jan 2022.

Builds on

66 of 104 references.

References · 66

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  3. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  4. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  5. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
  6. 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,875
  7. 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,430
  8. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
  9. 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,278
  10. 2018Attention-based Deep Multiple Instance Learningcited by 1,077
  11. 2014Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Netcited by 983
  12. 2017Grad-CAM++: Improved Visual Explanations for Deep Convolutional Networkscited by 936
38 more
  1. 2017Interpretable Explanations of Black Boxes by Meaningful Perturbationcited by 611
  2. 2013Network In Networkcited by 600
  3. 2020Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 580
  4. 2016ScribbleSup: Scribble-Supervised Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentationcited by 330
  5. 2016Top-down Neural Attention by Excitation Backpropcited by 318
  6. 2020Self-supervised Equivariant Attention Mechanism for Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 299
  7. 2015What's the Point: Semantic Segmentation with Point Supervisioncited by 297
  8. 2019Understanding Deep Networks via Extremal Perturbations and Smooth Maskscited by 257
  9. 2015BoxSup: Exploiting Bounding Boxes to Supervise Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentationcited by 238
  10. 2020Causal Intervention for Weakly-Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 229
  11. 2016Simple Does It: Weakly Supervised Instance and Semantic Segmentationcited by 226
  12. 2017Hide-and-Seek: Forcing a Network to be Meticulous for Weakly-supervised Object and Action Localizationcited by 207
  13. 2017Object Region Mining with Adversarial Erasing: A Simple Classification to Semantic Segmentation Approachcited by 201
  14. 2016Seed, Expand and Constrain: Three Principles for Weakly-Supervised Image Segmentationcited by 198
  15. 2020Evaluating and Aggregating Feature-based Model Explanationscited by 185
  16. 2018Tell Me Where to Look: Guided Attention Inference Networkcited by 168
  17. 2018Adversarial Complementary Learning for Weakly Supervised Object Localizationcited by 166
  18. 2019FickleNet: Weakly and Semi-supervised Semantic Image Segmentation using Stochastic Inferencecited by 162
  19. 2018Visual Interpretability for Deep Learning: a Surveycited by 155
  20. 2020Axiom-based Grad-CAM: Towards Accurate Visualization and Explanation of CNNscited by 151
  21. 2018Revisiting Dilated Convolution: A Simple Approach for Weakly- and Semi- Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 145
  22. 2019Attention-based Dropout Layer for Weakly Supervised Object Localizationcited by 125
  23. 2018On Regularized Losses for Weakly-supervised CNN Segmentationcited by 121
  24. 2019Smooth Grad-CAM++: An Enhanced Inference Level Visualization Technique for Deep Convolutional Neural Network Modelscited by 118
  25. 2018Normalized Cut Loss for Weakly-supervised CNN Segmentationcited by 112
  26. 2020Evaluating Weakly Supervised Object Localization Methods Rightcited by 104
  27. 2015Constrained Convolutional Neural Networks for Weakly Supervised Segmentationcited by 100
  28. 2017Machine learning methods for histopathological image analysiscited by 79
  29. 2018Weakly Supervised Instance Segmentation using Class Peak Responsecited by 74
  30. 2018Interpretable Deep Learning under Firecited by 74
  31. 2018Self-produced Guidance for Weakly-supervised Object Localizationcited by 72
  32. 2018Constrained-CNN losses for weakly supervised segmentationcited by 62
  33. 2021Adaptive Early-Learning Correction for Segmentation from Noisy Annotationscited by 61
  34. 2017Constrained Deep Weak Supervision for Histopathology Image Segmentationcited by 51
  35. 2020Rethinking the Route Towards Weakly Supervised Object Localizationcited by 46
  36. 2020Bounding boxes for weakly supervised segmentation: Global constraints get close to full supervisioncited by 40
  37. 2021Shallow Feature Matters for Weakly Supervised Object Localizationcited by 34
  38. 2019Constrained Deep Networks: Lagrangian Optimization via Log-Barrier Extensionscited by 30

50 most cited of 66 All 66 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.

8 papers.