mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

DiPS: Discriminative Pseudo-Label Sampling with Self-Supervised Transformers for Weakly Supervised Object Localization

arXiv 2310.06196 ↗First posted 9 Oct 2023cs.CVcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Self-supervised vision transformers (SSTs) have shown great potential to yield rich localization maps that highlight different objects in an image. However, these maps remain class-agnostic since the model is unsupervised. They often tend to decompose the image into multiple maps containing different objects while being unable to distinguish the object of interest from background noise objects. In this paper, Discriminative Pseudo-label Sampling (DiPS) is introduced to leverage these class-agnostic maps for weakly-supervised object localization (WSOL), where only image-class labels are available. Given multiple attention maps, DiPS relies on a pre-trained classifier to identify the most discriminative regions of each attention map. This ensures that the selected ROIs cover the correct image object while discarding the background ones, and, as such, provides a rich pool of diverse and discriminative proposals to cover different parts of the object. Subsequently, these proposals are used as pseudo-labels to train our new transformer-based WSOL model designed to perform classification and localization tasks. Unlike standard WSOL methods, DiPS optimizes performance in both tasks by using a transformer encoder and a dedicated output head for each task, each trained using dedicated loss functions. To avoid overfitting a single proposal and promote better object coverage, a single proposal is randomly selected among the top ones for a training image at each training step. Experimental results on the challenging CUB, ILSVRC, OpenImages, and TelDrone datasets indicate that our architecture, in combination with our transformer-based proposals, can yield better localization performance than state-of-the-art methods.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 60 of its 72 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Oct 2023.

Builds on

60 of 72 references.

References · 60

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  4. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,893
  5. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  6. 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,829
  7. 2016DeepLab: Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets, Atrous Convolution, and Fully Connected CRFscited by 3,239
  8. 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,875
  9. 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,430
  10. 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,278
  11. 2021An Empirical Study of Training Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 1,610
  12. 2021SimMIM: A Simple Framework for Masked Image Modelingcited by 1,147
38 more
  1. 2017Grad-CAM++: Improved Visual Explanations for Deep Convolutional Networkscited by 936
  2. 2020Quantifying Attention Flow in Transformerscited by 759
  3. 2017Network Dissection: Quantifying Interpretability of Deep Visual Representationscited by 703
  4. 2019Score-CAM: Score-Weighted Visual Explanations for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 575
  5. 2020Self-supervised Equivariant Attention Mechanism for Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 299
  6. 2019Understanding Deep Networks via Extremal Perturbations and Smooth Maskscited by 257
  7. 2017Hide-and-Seek: Forcing a Network to be Meticulous for Weakly-supervised Object and Action Localizationcited by 207
  8. 2017Object Region Mining with Adversarial Erasing: A Simple Classification to Semantic Segmentation Approachcited by 201
  9. 2016Seed, Expand and Constrain: Three Principles for Weakly-Supervised Image Segmentationcited by 198
  10. 2018Adversarial Complementary Learning for Weakly Supervised Object Localizationcited by 166
  11. 2019FickleNet: Weakly and Semi-supervised Semantic Image Segmentation using Stochastic Inferencecited by 162
  12. 2020Axiom-based Grad-CAM: Towards Accurate Visualization and Explanation of CNNscited by 151
  13. 2021Efficient Self-supervised Vision Transformers for Representation Learningcited by 149
  14. 2018Revisiting Dilated Convolution: A Simple Approach for Weakly- and Semi- Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 145
  15. 2019Attention-based Dropout Layer for Weakly Supervised Object Localizationcited by 125
  16. 2021TS-CAM: Token Semantic Coupled Attention Map for Weakly Supervised Object Localizationcited by 122
  17. 2018On Regularized Losses for Weakly-supervised CNN Segmentationcited by 121
  18. 2022CLIP is Also an Efficient Segmenter: A Text-Driven Approach for Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 118
  19. 2019Large-scale interactive object segmentation with human annotatorscited by 109
  20. 2020Evaluating Weakly Supervised Object Localization Methods Rightcited by 104
  21. 2018Weakly-Supervised Semantic Segmentation by Iteratively Mining Common Object Featurescited by 81
  22. 2018Self-produced Guidance for Weakly-supervised Object Localizationcited by 72
  23. 2020Inter-Image Communication for Weakly Supervised Localizationcited by 52
  24. 2020Rethinking the Route Towards Weakly Supervised Object Localizationcited by 46
  25. 2020SS-CAM: Smoothed Score-CAM for Sharper Visual Feature Localizationcited by 46
  26. 2021Unveiling the Potential of Structure Preserving for Weakly Supervised Object Localizationcited by 46
  27. 2021Shallow Feature Matters for Weakly Supervised Object Localizationcited by 34
  28. 2021Online Refinement of Low-level Feature Based Activation Map for Weakly Supervised Object Localizationcited by 30
  29. 2020IS-CAM: Integrated Score-CAM for axiomatic-based explanationscited by 29
  30. 2019Deep Weakly-Supervised Learning Methods for Classification and Localization in Histology Images: A Surveycited by 28
  31. 2021F-CAM: Full Resolution Class Activation Maps via Guided Parametric Upscalingcited by 26
  32. 2022Bridging the Gap between Classification and Localization for Weakly Supervised Object Localizationcited by 25
  33. 2019Combinational Class Activation Maps for Weakly Supervised Object Localizationcited by 24
  34. 2021LCTR: On Awakening the Local Continuity of Transformer for Weakly Supervised Object Localizationcited by 24
  35. 2021Background Activation Suppression for Weakly Supervised Object Localizationcited by 22
  36. 2022CREAM: Weakly Supervised Object Localization via Class RE-Activation Mappingcited by 21
  37. 2022Weakly Supervised Object Localization via Transformer with Implicit Spatial Calibrationcited by 20
  38. 2021Normalization Matters in Weakly Supervised Object Localizationcited by 19

50 most cited of 60 All 60 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

8 papers.