mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Towards Fair Recommendation in Two-Sided Platforms

arXiv 2201.01180 ↗First posted 26 Dec 2021cs.IR cs.AI cs.LGcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Many online platforms today (such as Amazon, Netflix, Spotify, LinkedIn, and AirBnB) can be thought of as two-sided markets with producers and customers of goods and services. Traditionally, recommendation services in these platforms have focused on maximizing customer satisfaction by tailoring the results according to the personalized preferences of individual customers. However, our investigation reinforces the fact that such customer-centric design of these services may lead to unfair distribution of exposure to the producers, which may adversely impact their well-being. On the other hand, a pure producer-centric design might become unfair to the customers. As more and more people are depending on such platforms to earn a living, it is important to ensure fairness to both producers and customers. In this work, by mapping a fair personalized recommendation problem to a constrained version of the problem of fairly allocating indivisible goods, we propose to provide fairness guarantees for both sides. Formally, our proposed em FairRec algorithm guarantees Maxi-Min Share (α-MMS) of exposure for the producers, and Envy-Free up to One Item (EF1) fairness for the customers. Extensive evaluations over multiple real-world datasets show the effectiveness of em FairRec in ensuring two-sided fairness while incurring a marginal loss in overall recommendation quality. Finally, we present a modification of FairRec (named as FairRecPlus) that at the cost of additional computation time, improves the recommendation performance for the customers, while maintaining the same fairness guarantees.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Dec 2021.

Builds on

22 of 66 references.

References · 22

  1. 2018Fairness of Exposure in Rankingscited by 190
  2. 2019Fairness-Aware Ranking in Search & Recommendation Systems with Application to LinkedIn Talent Searchcited by 138
  3. 2018Equity of Attention: Amortizing Individual Fairness in Rankingscited by 124
  4. 2019Managing Popularity Bias in Recommender Systems with Personalized Re-rankingcited by 82
  5. 2020FairRec: Two-Sided Fairness for Personalized Recommendations in Two-Sided Platformscited by 78
  6. 2017Translation-based Recommendationcited by 71
  7. 2017Multisided Fairness for Recommendationcited by 70
  8. 2018Estimating Position Bias without Intrusive Interventionscited by 32
  9. 2019Multi-stakeholder Recommendation and its Connection to Multi-sided Fairnesscited by 19
  10. 2018Fair Division Under Cardinality Constraintscited by 11
  11. 2018Equality of Voice: Towards Fair Representation in Crowdsourced Top-K Recommendationscited by 11
  12. 2017Fair Allocation of Indivisible Goods: Improvement and Generalizationcited by 10
10 more
  1. 2015Approximation Algorithms for Computing Maximin Share Allocationscited by 9
  2. 2017Approximation Algorithms for Maximin Fair Divisioncited by 8
  3. 2020Comparing Fair Ranking Metricscited by 8
  4. 2018Comparing Approximate Relaxations of Envy-Freenesscited by 7
  5. 2021When the Umpire is also a Player: Bias in Private Label Product Recommendations on E-commerce Marketplacescited by 7
  6. 2017Groupwise Maximin Fair Allocation of Indivisible Goodscited by 6
  7. 2019Incremental Fairness in Two-Sided Market Platforms: On Smoothly Updating Recommendationscited by 6
  8. 2017Fair Division of a Graphcited by 4
  9. 2018Almost Envy-Free Allocations with Connected Bundlescited by 4
  10. 2020Analyzing 'Near Me' Services: Potential for Exposure Bias in Location-based Retrievalcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.

8 papers.