Fair Division Under Cardinality Constraints
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We consider the problem of fairly allocating indivisible goods, among agents, under cardinality constraints and additive valuations. In this setting, we are given a partition of the entire set of goods---i.e., the goods are categorized---and a limit is specified on the number of goods that can be allocated from each category to any agent. The objective here is to find a fair allocation in which the subset of goods assigned to any agent satisfies the given cardinality constraints. This problem naturally captures a number of resource-allocation applications, and is a generalization of the well-studied (unconstrained) fair division problem. The two central notions of fairness, in the context of fair division of indivisible goods, are envy freeness up to one good (EF1) and the (approximate) maximin share guarantee (MMS). We show that the existence and algorithmic guarantees established for these solution concepts in the unconstrained setting can essentially be achieved under cardinality constraints. Specifically, we develop efficient algorithms which compute EF1 and approximately MMS allocations in the constrained setting. Furthermore, focusing on the case wherein all the agents have the same additive valuation, we establish that EF1 allocations exist and can be computed efficiently even under laminar matroid constraints.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 25 Apr 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 2; 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
10 papers.
- 2022Fair Ranking as Fair Division: Impact-Based Individual Fairness in Rankingcited by 13
- 2021Towards Fair Recommendation in Two-Sided Platformscited by 8
- 2021Two-Sided Matching Meets Fair Divisioncited by 5
- 2021A Quadratic Time Locally Optimal Algorithm for NP-hard Equal Cardinality Partition Optimizationcited by 3
- 2023Fairness for Workers Who Pull the Arms: An Index Based Policy for Allocation of Restless Bandit Taskscited by 3
- 2022A Linearithmic Time Locally Optimal Algorithm for the Multiway Number Partition Optimizationcited by 2
- 2024Fair Division with Market Valuescited by 2
- 2023A 2-opt Algorithm for Locally Optimal Set Partition Optimizationcited by 0
- 2023First-Choice Maximality Meets Ex-ante and Ex-post Fairnesscited by 0
- 2026Maximin Share Guarantees via Limited Cost-Sensitive Sharingcited by 0
- 2026Maximin Share Guarantees via Limited Cost-Sensitive Sharing24 Feb 2026
- 2024Fair Division with Market Values30 Oct 2024
- 2023First-Choice Maximality Meets Ex-ante and Ex-post Fairness8 May 2023
- 2023A 2-opt Algorithm for Locally Optimal Set Partition Optimization14 Mar 2023
- 2023Fairness for Workers Who Pull the Arms: An Index Based Policy for Allocation of Restless Bandit Tasks1 Mar 2023
- 2022Fair Ranking as Fair Division: Impact-Based Individual Fairness in Ranking15 Jun 2022
- 2022A Linearithmic Time Locally Optimal Algorithm for the Multiway Number Partition Optimization10 Mar 2022
- 2021Towards Fair Recommendation in Two-Sided Platforms26 Dec 2021
- 2021A Quadratic Time Locally Optimal Algorithm for NP-hard Equal Cardinality Partition Optimization16 Sep 2021
- 2021Two-Sided Matching Meets Fair Division15 Jul 2021