Fair Division of a Graph
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We consider fair allocation of indivisible items under an additional constraint: there is an undirected graph describing the relationship between the items, and each agent's share must form a connected subgraph of this graph. This framework captures, e.g., fair allocation of land plots, where the graph describes the accessibility relation among the plots. We focus on agents that have additive utilities for the items, and consider several common fair division solution concepts, such as proportionality, envy-freeness and maximin share guarantee. While finding good allocations according to these solution concepts is computationally hard in general, we design efficient algorithms for special cases where the underlying graph has simple structure, and/or the number of agents -or, less restrictively, the number of agent types- is small. In particular, despite non-existence results in the general case, we prove that for acyclic graphs a maximin share allocation always exists and can be found efficiently.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 29 May 2017.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 2.
4 papers.
- 2021Towards Fair Recommendation in Two-Sided Platformscited by 8
- 2023The Complexity of Envy-Free Graph Cuttingcited by 0
- 2025On Approximate MMS Allocations on Restricted Graph Classescited by 0
- 2025Estimating Fair Graphs from Graph-Stationary Datacited by 0
- 2025Estimating Fair Graphs from Graph-Stationary Data8 Oct 2025
- 2025On Approximate MMS Allocations on Restricted Graph Classes8 Aug 2025
- 2023The Complexity of Envy-Free Graph Cutting12 Dec 2023
- 2021Towards Fair Recommendation in Two-Sided Platforms26 Dec 2021