Approximation Algorithms for Computing Maximin Share Allocations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study the problem of computing maximin share guarantees, a recently introduced fairness notion. Given a set of n agents and a set of goods, the maximin share of a single agent is the best that she can guarantee to herself, if she would be allowed to partition the goods in any way she prefers, into n bundles, and then receive her least desirable bundle. The objective then in our problem is to find a partition, so that each agent is guaranteed her maximin share. In settings with indivisible goods, such allocations are not guaranteed to exist, so we resort to approximation algorithms. Our main result is a 2/3-approximation, that runs in polynomial time for any number of agents. This improves upon the algorithm of Procaccia and Wang, which also produces a 2/3-approximation but runs in polynomial time only for a constant number of agents. To achieve this, we redesign certain parts of their algorithm. Furthermore, motivated by the apparent difficulty, both theoretically and experimentally, in finding lower bounds on the existence of approximate solutions, we undertake a probabilistic analysis. We prove that in randomly generated instances, with high probability there exists a maximin share allocation. This can be seen as a justification of the experimental evidence reported in relevant works. Finally, we provide further positive results for two special cases that arise from previous works. The first one is the intriguing case of 3 agents, for which it is already known that exact maximin share allocations do not always exist (contrary to the case of 2 agents). We provide a 7/8-approximation algorithm, improving the previously known result of 3/4. The second case is when all item values belong to 0, 1, 2, extending the 0, 1 setting studied in Bouveret and Lemaitre. We obtain an exact algorithm for any number of agents in this case.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 3 Mar 2015.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.
9 papers.
- 2021Towards Fair Recommendation in Two-Sided Platformscited by 8
- 2025Approximate Proportionality in Online Fair Divisioncited by 4
- 2021Allocating Indivisible Goods to Strategic Agents: Pure Nash Equilibria and Fairnesscited by 3
- 2022Fair Shares: Feasibility, Domination and Incentivescited by 2
- 2021Guaranteeing Maximin Shares: Some Agents Left Behindcited by 1
- 2024Learning Fair and Preferable Allocations through Neural Networkcited by 0
- 2025Probing EFX via PMMS: (Non-)Existence Results in Discrete Fair Divisioncited by 0
- 2025On Approximate MMS Allocations on Restricted Graph Classescited by 0
- 2026Improving the Bounds on Approximating Weighted Maximin Share for Chorescited by 0
- 2026Improving the Bounds on Approximating Weighted Maximin Share for Chores11 Oct 2026
- 2025On Approximate MMS Allocations on Restricted Graph Classes8 Aug 2025
- 2025Approximate Proportionality in Online Fair Division5 Aug 2025
- 2025Probing EFX via PMMS: (Non-)Existence Results in Discrete Fair Division20 Jul 2025
- 2024Learning Fair and Preferable Allocations through Neural Network23 Oct 2024
- 2022Fair Shares: Feasibility, Domination and Incentives16 May 2022
- 2021Towards Fair Recommendation in Two-Sided Platforms26 Dec 2021
- 2021Allocating Indivisible Goods to Strategic Agents: Pure Nash Equilibria and Fairness17 Sep 2021
- 2021Guaranteeing Maximin Shares: Some Agents Left Behind19 May 2021