Groupwise Maximin Fair Allocation of Indivisible Goods
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study the problem of allocating indivisible goods among n agents in a fair manner. For this problem, maximin share (MMS) is a well-studied solution concept which provides a fairness threshold. Specifically, maximin share is defined as the minimum utility that an agent can guarantee for herself when asked to partition the set of goods into n bundles such that the remaining (n-1) agents pick their bundles adversarially. An allocation is deemed to be fair if every agent gets a bundle whose valuation is at least her maximin share. Even though maximin shares provide a natural benchmark for fairness, it has its own drawbacks and, in particular, it is not sufficient to rule out unsatisfactory allocations. Motivated by these considerations, in this work we define a stronger notion of fairness, called groupwise maximin share guarantee (GMMS). In GMMS, we require that the maximin share guarantee is achieved not just with respect to the grand bundle, but also among all the subgroups of agents. Hence, this solution concept strengthens MMS and provides an ex-post fairness guarantee. We show that in specific settings, GMMS allocations always exist. We also establish the existence of approximate GMMS allocations under additive valuations, and develop a polynomial-time algorithm to find such allocations. Moreover, we establish a scale of fairness wherein we show that GMMS implies approximate envy freeness. Finally, we empirically demonstrate the existence of GMMS allocations in a large set of randomly generated instances. For the same set of instances, we additionally show that our algorithm achieves an approximation factor better than the established, worst-case bound.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 21 Nov 2017.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 3.
6 papers.
- 2021Towards Fair Recommendation in Two-Sided Platformscited by 8
- 2021Allocating Indivisible Goods to Strategic Agents: Pure Nash Equilibria and Fairnesscited by 3
- 2025Understanding EFX Allocations: Counting and Variantscited by 3
- 2022Fairness in Contextual Resource Allocation Systems: Metrics and Incompatibility Resultscited by 2
- 2025Probing EFX via PMMS: (Non-)Existence Results in Discrete Fair Divisioncited by 0
- 2025Rawlsian many-to-one matching with non-linear utilitycited by 0
- 2025Rawlsian many-to-one matching with non-linear utility4 Nov 2025
- 2025Probing EFX via PMMS: (Non-)Existence Results in Discrete Fair Division20 Jul 2025
- 2025Understanding EFX Allocations: Counting and Variants4 Apr 2025
- 2022Fairness in Contextual Resource Allocation Systems: Metrics and Incompatibility Results4 Dec 2022
- 2021Towards Fair Recommendation in Two-Sided Platforms26 Dec 2021
- 2021Allocating Indivisible Goods to Strategic Agents: Pure Nash Equilibria and Fairness17 Sep 2021