mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Multi-Expert Human Action Recognition with Hierarchical Super-Class Learning

arXiv 2112.07015 ↗First posted 13 Dec 2021cs.CV cs.HCcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In still image human action recognition, existing studies have mainly leveraged extra bounding box information along with class labels to mitigate the lack of temporal information in still images; however, preparing extra data with manual annotation is time-consuming and also prone to human errors. Moreover, the existing studies have not addressed action recognition with long-tailed distribution. In this paper, we propose a two-phase multi-expert classification method for human action recognition to cope with long-tailed distribution by means of super-class learning and without any extra information. To choose the best configuration for each super-class and characterize inter-class dependency between different action classes, we propose a novel Graph-Based Class Selection (GCS) algorithm. In the proposed approach, a coarse-grained phase selects the most relevant fine-grained experts. Then, the fine-grained experts encode the intricate details within each super-class so that the inter-class variation increases. Extensive experimental evaluations are conducted on various public human action recognition datasets, including Stanford40, Pascal VOC 2012 Action, BU101+, and IHAR datasets. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method yields promising improvements. To be more specific, in IHAR, Sanford40, Pascal VOC 2012 Action, and BU101+ benchmarks, the proposed approach outperforms the state-of-the-art studies by 8.92%, 0.41%, 0.66%, and 2.11 % with much less computational cost and without any auxiliary annotation information. Besides, it is proven that in addressing action recognition with long-tailed distribution, the proposed method outperforms its counterparts by a significant margin.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Dec 2021.

Builds on

20 of 56 references.

References · 20

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
  3. 2019Libra R-CNN: Towards Balanced Learning for Object Detectioncited by 255
  4. 2017Detecting and Recognizing Human-Object Interactionscited by 199
  5. 2020Overcoming Classifier Imbalance for Long-tail Object Detection with Balanced Group Softmaxcited by 152
  6. 2019Smooth Grad-CAM++: An Enhanced Inference Level Visualization Technique for Deep Convolutional Neural Network Modelscited by 118
  7. 2020Learning Human-Object Interaction Detection using Interaction Pointscited by 108
  8. 2020Skeleton-based Action Recognition via Spatial and Temporal Transformer Networkscited by 98
  9. 2020PaStaNet: Toward Human Activity Knowledge Enginecited by 79
  10. 2020Detecting Human-Object Interactions with Action Co-occurrence Priorscited by 72
  11. 2019Prime Sample Attention in Object Detectioncited by 55
  12. 2019Towards Accurate One-Stage Object Detection with AP-Losscited by 36
8 more
  1. 2015Contextual Action Recognition with R*CNNcited by 33
  2. 2019DR Loss: Improving Object Detection by Distributional Rankingcited by 24
  3. 2016Single Image Action Recognition using Semantic Body Part Actionscited by 14
  4. 2019Generating Positive Bounding Boxes for Balanced Training of Object Detectorscited by 7
  5. 2020Discriminative feature generation for classification of imbalanced datacited by 7
  6. 2016Action Classification via Concepts and Attributescited by 5
  7. 2018Loss Guided Activation for Action Recognition in Still Imagescited by 5
  8. 2020Ensembles of Deep Neural Networks for Action Recognition in Still Imagescited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 2.

5 papers.