mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Self-Organized Polynomial-Time Coordination Graphs

arXiv 2112.03547 ↗First posted 7 Dec 2021cs.LG cs.AI cs.MAcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Coordination graph is a promising approach to model agent collaboration in multi-agent reinforcement learning. It conducts a graph-based value factorization and induces explicit coordination among agents to complete complicated tasks. However, one critical challenge in this paradigm is the complexity of greedy action selection with respect to the factorized values. It refers to the decentralized constraint optimization problem (DCOP), which and whose constant-ratio approximation are NP-hard problems. To bypass this systematic hardness, this paper proposes a novel method, named Self-Organized Polynomial-time Coordination Graphs (SOP-CG), which uses structured graph classes to guarantee the accuracy and the computational efficiency of collaborated action selection. SOP-CG employs dynamic graph topology to ensure sufficient value function expressiveness. The graph selection is unified into an end-to-end learning paradigm. In experiments, we show that our approach learns succinct and well-adapted graph topologies, induces effective coordination, and improves performance across a variety of cooperative multi-agent tasks.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Dec 2021.

Builds on

26 of 52 references.

References · 26

  1. 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,016
  2. 2017Multi-Agent Actor-Critic for Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Environmentscited by 1,519
  3. 2018Relational inductive biases, deep learning, and graph networkscited by 1,341
  4. 2017Counterfactual Multi-Agent Policy Gradientscited by 733
  5. 2019The StarCraft Multi-Agent Challengecited by 589
  6. 2020Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 475
  7. 2019QTRAN: Learning to Factorize with Transformation for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 372
  8. 2020QPLEX: Duplex Dueling Multi-Agent Q-Learningcited by 267
  9. 2018TarMAC: Targeted Multi-Agent Communicationcited by 201
  10. 2020Weighted QMIX: Expanding Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 197
  11. 2019A Review of Cooperative Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 147
  12. 2020ROMA: Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Emergent Rolescited by 135
14 more
  1. 2020RODE: Learning Roles to Decompose Multi-Agent Taskscited by 125
  2. 2017Stabilising Experience Replay for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 114
  3. 2018Learning when to Communicate at Scale in Multiagent Cooperative and Competitive Taskscited by 114
  4. 2020Off-Policy Multi-Agent Decomposed Policy Gradientscited by 97
  5. 2019Deep Coordination Graphscited by 96
  6. 2019Learning Nearly Decomposable Value Functions Via Communication Minimizationcited by 85
  7. 2019Probabilistic Recursive Reasoning for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 68
  8. 2020Deep Implicit Coordination Graphs for Multi-agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 58
  9. 2020How Much and When Do We Need Higher-order Information in Hypergraphs? A Case Study on Hyperedge Predictioncited by 31
  10. 2021Context-Aware Sparse Deep Coordination Graphscited by 27
  11. 2016Distributed Constraint Optimization Problems and Applications: A Surveycited by 26
  12. 2020The Emergence of Individualitycited by 22
  13. 2019Analysing Factorizations of Action-Value Networks for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 12
  14. 2015Near-Optimal UGC-hardness of Approximating Max k-CSP_Rcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 5; 2025: 2; 2026: 4.

14 papers.

Sort:

By area: