mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Non-Linear Coordination Graphs

arXiv 2211.08404 ↗First posted 26 Oct 2022cs.MA cs.AI cs.LGcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Value decomposition multi-agent reinforcement learning methods learn the global value function as a mixing of each agent's individual utility functions. Coordination graphs (CGs) represent a higher-order decomposition by incorporating pairwise payoff functions and thus is supposed to have a more powerful representational capacity. However, CGs decompose the global value function linearly over local value functions, severely limiting the complexity of the value function class that can be represented. In this paper, we propose the first non-linear coordination graph by extending CG value decomposition beyond the linear case. One major challenge is to conduct greedy action selections in this new function class to which commonly adopted DCOP algorithms are no longer applicable. We study how to solve this problem when mixing networks with LeakyReLU activation are used. An enumeration method with a global optimality guarantee is proposed and motivates an efficient iterative optimization method with a local optimality guarantee. We find that our method can achieve superior performance on challenging multi-agent coordination tasks like MACO.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Oct 2022.

Builds on

27 of 49 references.

References · 27

  1. 2017Multi-Agent Actor-Critic for Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Environmentscited by 1,558
  2. 2018QMIX: Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 708
  3. 2019The StarCraft Multi-Agent Challengecited by 597
  4. 2016Input Convex Neural Networkscited by 414
  5. 2014On the Number of Linear Regions of Deep Neural Networkscited by 381
  6. 2019QTRAN: Learning to Factorize with Transformation for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 379
  7. 2020QPLEX: Duplex Dueling Multi-Agent Q-Learningcited by 270
  8. 2016Understanding Deep Neural Networks with Rectified Linear Unitscited by 257
  9. 2019MAVEN: Multi-Agent Variational Explorationcited by 185
  10. 2015The Power of Depth for Feedforward Neural Networkscited by 183
  11. 2019Complexity of Linear Regions in Deep Networkscited by 167
  12. 2017Bounding and Counting Linear Regions of Deep Neural Networkscited by 161
15 more
  1. 2020ROMA: Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Emergent Rolescited by 137
  2. 2020RODE: Learning Roles to Decompose Multi-Agent Taskscited by 125
  3. 2019Deep Coordination Graphscited by 98
  4. 2020Off-Policy Multi-Agent Decomposed Policy Gradientscited by 98
  5. 2021Celebrating Diversity in Shared Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 98
  6. 2013On the number of response regions of deep feed forward networks with piece-wise linear activationscited by 94
  7. 2019Learning Nearly Decomposable Value Functions Via Communication Minimizationcited by 86
  8. 2019Influence-Based Multi-Agent Explorationcited by 75
  9. 2020Deep Implicit Coordination Graphs for Multi-agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 60
  10. 2018Exact and Consistent Interpretation for Piecewise Linear Neural Networks: A Closed Form Solutioncited by 32
  11. 2021Context-Aware Sparse Deep Coordination Graphscited by 28
  12. 2018Cooperative and Distributed Reinforcement Learning of Drones for Field Coveragecited by 20
  13. 2021Self-Organized Polynomial-Time Coordination Graphscited by 15
  14. 2019Analysing Factorizations of Action-Value Networks for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 12
  15. 2018Multi-vehicle Flocking Control with Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient Methodcited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 4; 2025: 1; 2026: 4.

10 papers.