mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Attentive Prototypes for Source-free Unsupervised Domain Adaptive 3D Object Detection

arXiv 2111.15656 ↗First posted 30 Nov 2021cs.CVcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

3D object detection networks tend to be biased towards the data they are trained on. Evaluation on datasets captured in different locations, conditions or sensors than that of the training (source) data results in a drop in model performance due to the gap in distribution with the test (or target) data. Current methods for domain adaptation either assume access to source data during training, which may not be available due to privacy or memory concerns, or require a sequence of lidar frames as an input. We propose a single-frame approach for source-free, unsupervised domain adaptation of lidar-based 3D object detectors that uses class prototypes to mitigate the effect pseudo-label noise. Addressing the limitations of traditional feature aggregation methods for prototype computation in the presence of noisy labels, we utilize a transformer module to identify outlier ROI's that correspond to incorrect, over-confident annotations, and compute an attentive class prototype. Under an iterative training strategy, the losses associated with noisy pseudo labels are down-weighed and thus refined in the process of self-training. To validate the effectiveness of our proposed approach, we examine the domain shift associated with networks trained on large, label-rich datasets (such as the Waymo Open Dataset and nuScenes) and evaluate on smaller, label-poor datasets (such as KITTI) and vice-versa. We demonstrate our approach on two recent object detectors and achieve results that out-perform the other domain adaptation works.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 49 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Nov 2021.

Builds on

49 of 59 references.

References · 49

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
  4. 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,384
  5. 2016PointNet: Deep Learning on Point Sets for 3D Classification and Segmentationcited by 5,223
  6. 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,560
  7. 2019nuScenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous drivingcited by 4,485
  8. 2017PointNet++: Deep Hierarchical Feature Learning on Point Sets in a Metric Spacecited by 4,384
  9. 2016Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)cited by 3,431
  10. 2021SegFormer: Simple and Efficient Design for Semantic Segmentation with Transformerscited by 2,923
  11. 2019Scalability in Perception for Autonomous Driving: Waymo Open Datasetcited by 2,436
  12. 2018PointPillars: Fast Encoders for Object Detection from Point Cloudscited by 1,707
37 more
  1. 2017VoxelNet: End-to-End Learning for Point Cloud Based 3D Object Detectioncited by 1,323
  2. 2019Self-training with Noisy Student improves ImageNet classificationcited by 1,304
  3. 2018PointRCNN: 3D Object Proposal Generation and Detection from Point Cloudcited by 939
  4. 2019PV-RCNN: Point-Voxel Feature Set Abstraction for 3D Object Detectioncited by 890
  5. 2019Argoverse: 3D Tracking and Forecasting with Rich Mapscited by 728
  6. 2016Multi-View 3D Object Detection Network for Autonomous Drivingcited by 721
  7. 2021Do Vision Transformers See Like Convolutional Neural Networks?cited by 671
  8. 2018Domain Adaptive Faster R-CNN for Object Detection in the Wildcited by 442
  9. 20203DSSD: Point-based 3D Single Stage Object Detectorcited by 440
  10. 2019Confidence Regularized Self-Trainingcited by 418
  11. 2021An End-to-End Transformer Model for 3D Object Detectioncited by 329
  12. 2017Joint 3D Proposal Generation and Object Detection from View Aggregationcited by 325
  13. 2018Strong-Weak Distribution Alignment for Adaptive Object Detectioncited by 269
  14. 2021Prototypical Pseudo Label Denoising and Target Structure Learning for Domain Adaptive Semantic Segmentationcited by 268
  15. 2020One Thousand and One Hours: Self-driving Motion Prediction Datasetcited by 239
  16. 2020Universal Source-Free Domain Adaptationcited by 219
  17. 2021Generalized Source-free Domain Adaptationcited by 175
  18. 2019MVX-Net: Multimodal VoxelNet for 3D Object Detectioncited by 162
  19. 2021ST3D: Self-training for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation on 3D Object Detectioncited by 158
  20. 2017Mind the Class Weight Bias: Weighted Maximum Mean Discrepancy for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 151
  21. 2020Train in Germany, Test in The USA: Making 3D Object Detectors Generalizecited by 150
  22. 2019Exploring Object Relation in Mean Teacher for Cross-Domain Detectioncited by 136
  23. 2018Robust Classification with Convolutional Prototype Learningcited by 122
  24. 2020Deep Learning for LiDAR Point Clouds in Autonomous Driving: A Reviewcited by 114
  25. 2019A Robust Learning Approach to Domain Adaptive Object Detectioncited by 109
  26. 2019Grid-GCN for Fast and Scalable Point Cloud Learningcited by 103
  27. 2021Unsupervised Domain Adaptation of Object Detectors: A Surveycited by 93
  28. 2020Canadian Adverse Driving Conditions Datasetcited by 86
  29. 2020A Free Lunch for Unsupervised Domain Adaptive Object Detection without Source Datacited by 79
  30. 2020Active Domain Adaptation via Clustering Uncertainty-weighted Embeddingscited by 71
  31. 2019Automatic adaptation of object detectors to new domains using self-trainingcited by 66
  32. 2021Unsupervised Domain Adaptive 3D Detection with Multi-Level Consistencycited by 63
  33. 2021ST3D++: Denoised Self-training for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation on 3D Object Detectioncited by 57
  34. 2018IPOD: Intensive Point-based Object Detector for Point Cloudcited by 46
  35. 2021Pseudo-labeling for Scalable 3D Object Detectioncited by 32
  36. 2020SF-UDA3D: Source-Free Unsupervised Domain Adaptation for LiDAR-Based 3D Object Detectioncited by 25
  37. 2018Learning Class Prototypes via Structure Alignment for Zero-Shot Recognitioncited by 14

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 4; 2023: 2; 2024: 4; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

13 papers.

Sort: