mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Fairness for AUC via Feature Augmentation

arXiv 2111.12823 ↗First posted 24 Nov 2021cs.LG cs.AI cs.CYcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study fairness in the context of classification where the performance is measured by the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic. AUC is commonly used to measure the performance of prediction models. The same classifier can have significantly varying AUCs for different protected groups and, in real-world applications, it is often desirable to reduce such cross-group differences. We address the problem of how to acquire additional features to most greatly improve AUC for the disadvantaged group. We develop a novel approach, fairAUC, based on feature augmentation (adding features) to mitigate bias between identifiable groups. The approach requires only a few summary statistics to offer provable guarantees on AUC improvement, and allows managers flexibility in determining where in the fairness-accuracy tradeoff they would like to be. We evaluate fairAUC on synthetic and real-world datasets and find that it significantly improves AUC for the disadvantaged group relative to benchmarks maximizing overall AUC and minimizing bias between groups.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Nov 2021.

Builds on

18 of 61 references.

References · 18

  1. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
  2. 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
  3. 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 672
  4. 2016Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scorescited by 586
  5. 2015An Introduction to Matrix Concentration Inequalitiescited by 397
  6. 2016Fairness Beyond Disparate Treatment & Disparate Impact: Learning Classification without Disparate Mistreatmentcited by 369
  7. 2019Bias in Bios: A Case Study of Semantic Representation Bias in a High-Stakes Settingcited by 349
  8. 2017Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Artcited by 315
  9. 2018Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need?cited by 262
  10. 2021A survey on datasets for fairness-aware machine learningcited by 157
  11. 2018Classification with Fairness Constraints: A Meta-Algorithm with Provable Guaranteescited by 146
  12. 2018Why Is My Classifier Discriminatory?cited by 143
6 more
  1. 2021It's COMPASlicated: The Messy Relationship between RAI Datasets and Algorithmic Fairness Benchmarkscited by 61
  2. 2019The Fairness of Risk Scores Beyond Classification: Bipartite Ranking and the xAUC Metriccited by 41
  3. 2018Individual Fairness in Hindsightcited by 33
  4. 2018Active Fairness in Algorithmic Decision Makingcited by 27
  5. 2019Fair Allocation through Selective Information Acquisitioncited by 16
  6. 2020On Fair Selection in the Presence of Implicit Variancecited by 14

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 3.

9 papers.