FairPOT: Balancing AUC Performance and Fairness with Proportional Optimal Transport
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Fairness metrics utilizing the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) have gained increasing attention in high-stakes domains such as healthcare, finance, and criminal justice. In these domains, fairness is often evaluated over risk scores rather than binary outcomes, and a common challenge is that enforcing strict fairness can significantly degrade AUC performance. To address this challenge, we propose Fair Proportional Optimal Transport (FairPOT), a novel, model-agnostic post-processing framework that strategically aligns risk score distributions across different groups using optimal transport, but does so selectively by transforming a controllable proportion, i.e., the top-lambda quantile, of scores within the disadvantaged group. By varying lambda, our method allows for a tunable trade-off between reducing AUC disparities and maintaining overall AUC performance. Furthermore, we extend FairPOT to the partial AUC setting, enabling fairness interventions to concentrate on the highest-risk regions. Extensive experiments on synthetic, public, and clinical datasets show that FairPOT consistently outperforms existing post-processing techniques in both global and partial AUC scenarios, often achieving improved fairness with slight AUC degradation or even positive gains in utility. The computational efficiency and practical adaptability of FairPOT make it a promising solution for real-world deployment.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Aug 2025.
Builds on
28 of 53 references.
References · 28
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
- 2016Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scorescited by 586
- 2019Nuanced Metrics for Measuring Unintended Bias with Real Data for Text Classificationcited by 404
- 2019A Framework for Understanding Sources of Harm throughout the Machine Learning Life Cyclecited by 193
- 2020Minimax Pareto Fairness: A Multi Objective Perspectivecited by 153
- 2019Wasserstein Fair Classificationcited by 131
- 2017Large-Scale Optimal Transport and Mapping Estimationcited by 123
- 2017Runaway Feedback Loops in Predictive Policingcited by 97
- 2021It's COMPASlicated: The Messy Relationship between RAI Datasets and Algorithmic Fairness Benchmarkscited by 61
- 2022Fair and Optimal Classification via Post-Processingcited by 51
16 more
- 2019The Fairness of Risk Scores Beyond Classification: Bipartite Ranking and the xAUC Metriccited by 41
- 2020All of the Fairness for Edge Prediction with Optimal Transportcited by 36
- 2022When AUC meets DRO: Optimizing Partial AUC for Deep Learning with Non-Convex Convergence Guaranteecited by 29
- 2022Minimax AUC Fairness: Efficient Algorithm with Provable Convergencecited by 16
- 2022Large-scale Optimization of Partial AUC in a Range of False Positive Ratescited by 15
- 2023LibAUC: A Deep Learning Library for X-Risk Optimizationcited by 15
- 2022Fair Data Representation for Machine Learning at the Pareto Frontiercited by 12
- 2022Optimal Transport of Classifiers to Fairnesscited by 12
- 2015Two-Way Partial AUC and Its Propertiescited by 11
- 2014Top Rank Optimization in Linear Timecited by 9
- 2021Fairness for AUC via Feature Augmentationcited by 9
- 2022Stochastic Methods for AUC Optimization subject to AUC-based Fairness Constraintscited by 9
- 2024Lower-Left Partial AUC: An Effective and Efficient Optimization Metric for Recommendationcited by 9
- 2022Algorithmic Foundations of Empirical X-risk Minimizationcited by 8
- 2023Bipartite Ranking Fairness through a Model Agnostic Ordering Adjustmentcited by 5
- 2018Direct Learning to Rank and Rerankcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.