DeCOM: Decomposed Policy for Constrained Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In recent years, multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) has presented impressive performance in various applications. However, physical limitations, budget restrictions, and many other factors usually impose textitconstraints on a multi-agent system (MAS), which cannot be handled by traditional MARL frameworks. Specifically, this paper focuses on constrained MASes where agents work textitcooperatively to maximize the expected team-average return under various constraints on expected team-average costs, and develops a textitconstrained cooperative MARL framework, named DeCOM, for such MASes. In particular, DeCOM decomposes the policy of each agent into two modules, which empowers information sharing among agents to achieve better cooperation. In addition, with such modularization, the training algorithm of DeCOM separates the original constrained optimization into an unconstrained optimization on reward and a constraints satisfaction problem on costs. DeCOM then iteratively solves these problems in a computationally efficient manner, which makes DeCOM highly scalable. We also provide theoretical guarantees on the convergence of DeCOM's policy update algorithm. Finally, we validate the effectiveness of DeCOM with various types of costs in both toy and large-scale (with 500 agents) environments.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 54 of its 73 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Nov 2021.
Builds on
54 of 73 references.
References · 54
- 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,407
- 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,621
- 2017Multi-Agent Actor-Critic for Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Environmentscited by 1,558
- 2019Dota 2 with Large Scale Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,103
- 2017Constrained Policy Optimizationcited by 983
- 2017Counterfactual Multi-Agent Policy Gradientscited by 751
- 2018QMIX: Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 708
- 2019The StarCraft Multi-Agent Challengecited by 597
- 2016Learning to Communicate with Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 575
- 2017Value-Decomposition Networks For Cooperative Multi-Agent Learningcited by 503
- 2018Reward Constrained Policy Optimizationcited by 417
- 2019Emergent Tool Use From Multi-Agent Autocurriculacited by 313
38 more
- 2018A Lyapunov-based Approach to Safe Reinforcement Learningcited by 297
- 2018Actor-Attention-Critic for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 261
- 2019Batch Policy Learning under Constraintscited by 244
- 2017Learning with Opponent-Learning Awarenesscited by 222
- 2018Mean Field Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 207
- 2020Projection-Based Constrained Policy Optimizationcited by 203
- 2020Weighted QMIX: Expanding Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 197
- 2018Fully Decentralized Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Networked Agentscited by 194
- 2020FACMAC: Factored Multi-Agent Centralised Policy Gradientscited by 178
- 2018Learning Attentional Communication for Multi-Agent Cooperationcited by 175
- 2015Risk-Sensitive and Robust Decision-Making: a CVaR Optimization Approachcited by 170
- 2019Constrained Reinforcement Learning Has Zero Duality Gapcited by 151
- 2020Exploration-Exploitation in Constrained MDPscited by 149
- 2019Lyapunov-based Safe Policy Optimization for Continuous Controlcited by 145
- 2020CRPO: A New Approach for Safe Reinforcement Learning with Convergence Guaranteecited by 134
- 2020Conservative Safety Critics for Explorationcited by 113
- 2020Variational Policy Gradient Method for Reinforcement Learning with General Utilitiescited by 111
- 2018Inequity aversion improves cooperation in intertemporal social dilemmascited by 106
- 2020Learning Zero-Sum Simultaneous-Move Markov Games Using Function Approximation and Correlated Equilibriumcited by 100
- 2019Deep Coordination Graphscited by 98
- 2020Off-Policy Multi-Agent Decomposed Policy Gradientscited by 98
- 2019Learning to Schedule Communication in Multi-agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 93
- 2021Learning Policies with Zero or Bounded Constraint Violation for Constrained MDPscited by 80
- 2020One Solution is Not All You Need: Few-Shot Extrapolation via Structured MaxEnt RLcited by 79
- 2020Safe Reinforcement Learning via Curriculum Inductioncited by 74
- 2021Learning Safe Multi-Agent Control with Decentralized Neural Barrier Certificatescited by 74
- 2019Learning Efficient Multi-agent Communication: An Information Bottleneck Approachcited by 61
- 2019Reinforcement Learning with Convex Constraintscited by 60
- 2019Efficient Ridesharing Order Dispatching with Mean Field Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 57
- 2019Convergent Policy Optimization for Safe Reinforcement Learningcited by 57
- 2020Learning Individually Inferred Communication for Multi-Agent Cooperationcited by 55
- 2021Safe Reinforcement Learning Using Advantage-Based Interventioncited by 47
- 2021Sample-Efficient Learning of Stackelberg Equilibria in General-Sum Gamescited by 40
- 2020Constrained Markov Decision Processes via Backward Value Functionscited by 33
- 2019CoRide: Joint Order Dispatching and Fleet Management for Multi-Scale Ride-Hailing Platformscited by 22
- 2019Value Propagation for Decentralized Networked Deep Multi-agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 19
- 2020Learning Multi-Agent Coordination for Enhancing Target Coverage in Directional Sensor Networkscited by 19
- 2020Balancing Constraints and Rewards with Meta-Gradient D4PGcited by 18
50 most cited of 54 All 54 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026α-fair heterogeneous agent reinforcement learningcited by 0
- 2026α-fair heterogeneous agent reinforcement learning11 Jun 2026