mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Anti-Concentrated Confidence Bonuses for Scalable Exploration

arXiv 2110.11202 ↗First posted 21 Oct 2021cs.LGcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Intrinsic rewards play a central role in handling the exploration-exploitation trade-off when designing sequential decision-making algorithms, in both foundational theory and state-of-the-art deep reinforcement learning. The LinUCB algorithm, a centerpiece of the stochastic linear bandits literature, prescribes an elliptical bonus which addresses the challenge of leveraging shared information in large action spaces. This bonus scheme cannot be directly transferred to high-dimensional exploration problems, however, due to the computational cost of maintaining the inverse covariance matrix of action features. We introduce anti-concentrated confidence bounds for efficiently approximating the elliptical bonus, using an ensemble of regressors trained to predict random noise from policy network-derived features. Using this approximation, we obtain stochastic linear bandit algorithms which obtain tilde O(d √T) regret bounds for poly(d) fixed actions. We develop a practical variant for deep reinforcement learning that is competitive with contemporary intrinsic reward heuristics on Atari benchmarks.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Oct 2021.

Builds on

30 of 56 references.

References · 30

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,279
  3. 2017Curiosity-driven Exploration by Self-supervised Predictioncited by 1,173
  4. 2018Exploration by Random Network Distillationcited by 966
  5. 2017Deep Bayesian Active Learning with Image Datacited by 812
  6. 2016Unifying Count-Based Exploration and Intrinsic Motivationcited by 632
  7. 2019Deep Batch Active Learning by Diverse, Uncertain Gradient Lower Boundscited by 602
  8. 2016Deep Exploration via Bootstrapped DQNcited by 518
  9. 2019Introduction to Multi-Armed Banditscited by 475
  10. 2016#Exploration: A Study of Count-Based Exploration for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 307
  11. 2018Large-Scale Study of Curiosity-Driven Learningcited by 277
  12. 2019Self-Supervised Exploration via Disagreementcited by 263
18 more
  1. 2016Variational Intrinsic Controlcited by 262
  2. 2017Count-Based Exploration with Neural Density Modelscited by 255
  3. 2013(More) Efficient Reinforcement Learning via Posterior Samplingcited by 233
  4. 2015Incentivizing Exploration In Reinforcement Learning With Deep Predictive Modelscited by 154
  5. 2021Gone Fishing: Neural Active Learning with Fisher Embeddingscited by 88
  6. 2017Scalable Generalized Linear Bandits: Online Computation and Hashingcited by 63
  7. 2017Ensemble Samplingcited by 62
  8. 2019Model-Predictive Policy Learning with Uncertainty Regularization for Driving in Dense Trafficcited by 50
  9. 2021Randomized Exploration for Reinforcement Learning with General Value Function Approximationcited by 49
  10. 2017Count-Based Exploration in Feature Space for Reinforcement Learningcited by 48
  11. 2020An Efficient Algorithm For Generalized Linear Bandit: Online Stochastic Gradient Descent and Thompson Samplingcited by 30
  12. 2019Perturbed-History Exploration in Stochastic Linear Banditscited by 28
  13. 2021Principled Exploration via Optimistic Bootstrapping and Backward Inductioncited by 26
  14. 2015Convergence Rates of Active Learning for Maximum Likelihood Estimationcited by 25
  15. 2020The Elliptical Potential Lemma Revisitedcited by 23
  16. 2019Deep Neural Linear Bandits: Overcoming Catastrophic Forgetting through Likelihood Matchingcited by 16
  17. 2019Perturbed-History Exploration in Stochastic Multi-Armed Banditscited by 16
  18. 2021Online Limited Memory Neural-Linear Bandits with Likelihood Matchingcited by 14

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 4; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

7 papers.