mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Convergence Rates of Active Learning for Maximum Likelihood Estimation

arXiv 1506.02348 ↗First posted 8 Jun 2015cs.LG stat.MLcited by 25

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

An active learner is given a class of models, a large set of unlabeled examples, and the ability to interactively query labels of a subset of these examples; the goal of the learner is to learn a model in the class that fits the data well. Previous theoretical work has rigorously characterized label complexity of active learning, but most of this work has focused on the PAC or the agnostic PAC model. In this paper, we shift our attention to a more general setting -- maximum likelihood estimation. Provided certain conditions hold on the model class, we provide a two-stage active learning algorithm for this problem. The conditions we require are fairly general, and cover the widely popular class of Generalized Linear Models, which in turn, include models for binary and multi-class classification, regression, and conditional random fields. We provide an upper bound on the label requirement of our algorithm, and a lower bound that matches it up to lower order terms. Our analysis shows that unlike binary classification in the realizable case, just a single extra round of interaction is sufficient to achieve near-optimal performance in maximum likelihood estimation. On the empirical side, the recent work in ~citeZhang12 and~citeZhang14 (on active linear and logistic regression) shows the promise of this approach.

Key facts. Cited by 25 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 8 Jun 2015.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 6; 2022: 8; 2023: 3; 2024: 5; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

25 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2021Gone Fishing: Neural Active Learning with Fisher Embeddingscited by 88
  2. 2023A comprehensive survey on deep active learning in medical image analysiscited by 35
  3. 2022Unifying Approaches in Active Learning and Active Sampling via Fisher Information and Information-Theoretic Quantitiescited by 28
  4. 2022Active Surrogate Estimators: An Active Learning Approach to Label-Efficient Model Evaluationcited by 26
  5. 2022Mitigating Dataset Bias by Using Per-sample Gradientcited by 22
  6. 2025Representation-Based Exploration for Language Models: From Test-Time to Post-Trainingcited by 16
  7. 2021Task-Optimal Exploration in Linear Dynamical Systemscited by 15
  8. 2022Fast Rates in Pool-Based Batch Active Learningcited by 15
  9. 2021Anti-Concentrated Confidence Bonuses for Scalable Explorationcited by 7
  10. 2021Exponential Reduction in Sample Complexity with Learning of Ising Model Dynamicscited by 6
  11. 2022Promises and Pitfalls of Threshold-based Auto-labelingcited by 6
  12. 2024Fast Fishing: Approximating BAIT for Efficient and Scalable Deep Active Image Classificationcited by 6
13 more
  1. 2024Active Preference Learning for Ordering Items In- and Out-of-samplecited by 6
  2. 2022Neural Active Learning on Heteroskedastic Distributionscited by 5
  3. 2025Logits are All We Need to Adapt Closed Modelscited by 5
  4. 2021A Survey on Active Deep Learning: From Model-driven to Data-drivencited by 4
  5. 2023Query Complexity of Active Learning for Function Family With Nearly Orthogonal Basiscited by 4
  6. 2021Active Learning of Quantum System Hamiltonians yields Query Advantagecited by 3
  7. 2022Margin-based sampling in high dimensions: When being active is less efficient than staying passivecited by 3
  8. 2023Active Cost-aware Labeling of Streaming Datacited by 3
  9. 2024FisherMask: Enhancing Neural Network Labeling Efficiency in Image Classification Using Fisher Informationcited by 3
  10. 2022Targeted active learning for probabilistic modelscited by 1
  11. 2026Active Learning for Stochastic Contextual Linear Banditscited by 1
  12. 2024Experimental Design for Active Transductive Inference in Large Language Modelscited by 0
  13. 2024FIRAL: An Active Learning Algorithm for Multinomial Logistic Regressioncited by 0