mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Survey on Legal Question Answering Systems

arXiv 2110.07333 ↗First posted 12 Oct 2021cs.IR cs.AI cs.CLcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Many legal professionals think that the explosion of information about local, regional, national, and international legislation makes their practice more costly, time-consuming, and even error-prone. The two main reasons for this are that most legislation is usually unstructured, and the tremendous amount and pace with which laws are released causes information overload in their daily tasks. In the case of the legal domain, the research community agrees that a system allowing to generate automatic responses to legal questions could substantially impact many practical implications in daily activities. The degree of usefulness is such that even a semi-automatic solution could significantly help to reduce the workload to be faced. This is mainly because a Question Answering system could be able to automatically process a massive amount of legal resources to answer a question or doubt in seconds, which means that it could save resources in the form of effort, money, and time to many professionals in the legal sector. In this work, we quantitatively and qualitatively survey the solutions that currently exist to meet this challenge.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 125 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Oct 2021.

Builds on

18 of 125 references.

References · 18

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  3. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  4. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  5. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,115
  6. 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,462
  7. 2018Deep contextualized word representationscited by 2,285
  8. 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,400
  9. 2018Learning Word Vectors for 157 Languagescited by 279
  10. 2019JEC-QA: A Legal-Domain Question Answering Datasetcited by 115
  11. 2021QA Dataset Explosion: A Taxonomy of NLP Resources for Question Answering and Reading Comprehensioncited by 91
  12. 2019Question Answering for Privacy Policies: Combining Computational and Legal Perspectivescited by 65
6 more
  1. 2020A Dataset for Statutory Reasoning in Tax Law Entailment and Question Answeringcited by 61
  2. 2016Question Answering on Freebase via Relation Extraction and Textual Evidencecited by 39
  3. 2020Neural Abstractive Summarization with Structural Attentioncited by 11
  4. 2017Legal Question Answering using Ranking SVM and Deep Convolutional Neural Networkcited by 9
  5. 2019Threshold-Based Retrieval and Textual Entailment Detection on Legal Bar Exam Questionscited by 4
  6. 2014Analysis of Watson's Strategies for Playing Jeopardy!cited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 5; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

10 papers.