Threshold-Based Retrieval and Textual Entailment Detection on Legal Bar Exam Questions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Getting an overview over the legal domain has become challenging, especially in a broad, international context. Legal question answering systems have the potential to alleviate this task by automatically retrieving relevant legal texts for a specific statement and checking whether the meaning of the statement can be inferred from the found documents. We investigate a combination of the BM25 scoring method of Elasticsearch with word embeddings trained on English translations of the German and Japanese civil law. For this, we define criteria which select a dynamic number of relevant documents according to threshold scores. Exploiting two deep learning classifiers and their respective prediction bias with a threshold-based answer inclusion criterion has shown to be beneficial for the textual entailment task, when compared to the baseline.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 May 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1.
4 papers.
- 2021A Survey on Legal Question Answering Systemscited by 10
- 2021JNLP Team: Deep Learning Approaches for Legal Processing Tasks in COLIEE 2021cited by 8
- 2022Transformer-based Approaches for Legal Text Processingcited by 3
- 2024Know When to Fuse: Investigating Non-English Hybrid Retrieval in the Legal Domaincited by 1
- 2024Know When to Fuse: Investigating Non-English Hybrid Retrieval in the Legal Domain2 Sep 2024
- 2022Transformer-based Approaches for Legal Text Processing13 Feb 2022
- 2021A Survey on Legal Question Answering Systems12 Oct 2021
- 2021JNLP Team: Deep Learning Approaches for Legal Processing Tasks in COLIEE 202125 Jun 2021