AIMS.au: A Dataset for the Analysis of Modern Slavery Countermeasures in Corporate Statements
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Despite over a decade of legislative efforts to address modern slavery in the supply chains of large corporations, the effectiveness of government oversight remains hampered by the challenge of scrutinizing thousands of statements annually. While Large Language Models (LLMs) can be considered a well established solution for the automatic analysis and summarization of documents, recognizing concrete modern slavery countermeasures taken by companies and differentiating those from vague claims remains a challenging task. To help evaluate and fine-tune LLMs for the assessment of corporate statements, we introduce a dataset composed of 5,731 modern slavery statements taken from the Australian Modern Slavery Register and annotated at the sentence level. This paper details the construction steps for the dataset that include the careful design of annotation specifications, the selection and preprocessing of statements, and the creation of high-quality annotation subsets for effective model evaluations. To demonstrate our dataset's utility, we propose a machine learning methodology for the detection of sentences relevant to mandatory reporting requirements set by the Australian Modern Slavery Act. We then follow this methodology to benchmark modern language models under zero-shot and supervised learning settings.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Feb 2025.
Builds on
15 of 45 references.
References · 15
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
- 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,243
- 2019HuggingFace's Transformers: State-of-the-art Natural Language Processingcited by 2,201
- 2023LegalBench: A Collaboratively Built Benchmark for Measuring Legal Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 328
- 2021The GEM Benchmark: Natural Language Generation, its Evaluation and Metricscited by 239
- 2024Leak, Cheat, Repeat: Data Contamination and Evaluation Malpractices in Closed-Source LLMscited by 224
- 2024An Introduction to Vision-Language Modelingcited by 175
- 2021ClimateBert: A Pretrained Language Model for Climate-Related Textcited by 89
- 2022The Harvard USPTO Patent Dataset: A Large-Scale, Well-Structured, and Multi-Purpose Corpus of Patent Applicationscited by 32
- 2023CHATREPORT: Democratizing Sustainability Disclosure Analysis through LLM-based Toolscited by 29
- 2020Analyzing Sustainability Reports Using Natural Language Processingcited by 18
3 more
- 2023ClimateBERT-NetZero: Detecting and Assessing Net Zero and Reduction Targetscited by 16
- 2022Deep Lake: a Lakehouse for Deep Learningcited by 13
- 2021A Survey on Legal Question Answering Systemscited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.