mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

An Experimental Evaluation on Deepfake Detection using Deep Face Recognition

arXiv 2110.01640 ↗First posted 4 Oct 2021cs.CV cs.AI cs.LGcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Significant advances in deep learning have obtained hallmark accuracy rates for various computer vision applications. However, advances in deep generative models have also led to the generation of very realistic fake content, also known as deepfakes, causing a threat to privacy, democracy, and national security. Most of the current deepfake detection methods are deemed as a binary classification problem in distinguishing authentic images or videos from fake ones using two-class convolutional neural networks (CNNs). These methods are based on detecting visual artifacts, temporal or color inconsistencies produced by deep generative models. However, these methods require a large amount of real and fake data for model training and their performance drops significantly in cross dataset evaluation with samples generated using advanced deepfake generation techniques. In this paper, we thoroughly evaluate the efficacy of deep face recognition in identifying deepfakes, using different loss functions and deepfake generation techniques. Experimental investigations on challenging Celeb-DF and FaceForensics++ deepfake datasets suggest the efficacy of deep face recognition in identifying deepfakes over two-class CNNs and the ocular modality. Reported results suggest a maximum Area Under Curve (AUC) of 0.98 and an Equal Error Rate (EER) of 7.1% in detecting deepfakes using face recognition on the Celeb-DF dataset. This EER is lower by 16.6% compared to the EER obtained for the two-class CNN and the ocular modality on the Celeb-DF dataset. Further on the FaceForensics++ dataset, an AUC of 0.99 and EER of 2.04% were obtained. The use of biometric facial recognition technology has the advantage of bypassing the need for a large amount of fake data for model training and obtaining better generalizability to evolving deepfake creation techniques.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Oct 2021.

Builds on

20 of 35 references.

References · 20

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2019FaceForensics++: Learning to Detect Manipulated Facial Imagescited by 1,101
  3. 2018CosFace: Large Margin Cosine Loss for Deep Face Recognitioncited by 971
  4. 2016Joint Face Detection and Alignment using Multi-task Cascaded Convolutional Networkscited by 903
  5. 2020Face2Face: Real-time Face Capture and Reenactment of RGB Videoscited by 632
  6. 2016MS-Celeb-1M: A Dataset and Benchmark for Large-Scale Face Recognitioncited by 624
  7. 2019Celeb-DF: A Large-scale Challenging Dataset for DeepFake Forensicscited by 575
  8. 2019Face X-ray for More General Face Forgery Detectioncited by 470
  9. 2018MesoNet: a Compact Facial Video Forgery Detection Networkcited by 409
  10. 2018Exposing DeepFake Videos By Detecting Face Warping Artifactscited by 319
  11. 2019On the Detection of Digital Face Manipulationcited by 260
  12. 2019Deferred Neural Rendering: Image Synthesis using Neural Texturescited by 253
8 more
  1. 2020The Creation and Detection of Deepfakes: A Surveycited by 247
  2. 2020DeepFakes and Beyond: A Survey of Face Manipulation and Fake Detectioncited by 233
  3. 2021WebFace260M: A Benchmark Unveiling the Power of Million-Scale Deep Face Recognitioncited by 223
  4. 2019FaceShifter: Towards High Fidelity And Occlusion Aware Face Swappingcited by 221
  5. 2018DeepFakes: a New Threat to Face Recognition? Assessment and Detectioncited by 209
  6. 2020ID-Reveal: Identity-aware DeepFake Video Detectioncited by 97
  7. 2020Detecting Deep-Fake Videos from Appearance and Behaviorcited by 66
  8. 2020Identity-Driven DeepFake Detectioncited by 17

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 4; 2024: 3; 2025: 2.

12 papers.