You Cannot Easily Catch Me: A Low-Detectable Adversarial Patch for Object Detectors
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Blind spots or outright deceit can bedevil and deceive machine learning models. Unidentified objects such as digital "stickers," also known as adversarial patches, can fool facial recognition systems, surveillance systems and self-driving cars. Fortunately, most existing adversarial patches can be outwitted, disabled and rejected by a simple classification network called an adversarial patch detector, which distinguishes adversarial patches from original images. An object detector classifies and predicts the types of objects within an image, such as by distinguishing a motorcyclist from the motorcycle, while also localizing each object's placement within the image by "drawing" so-called bounding boxes around each object, once again separating the motorcyclist from the motorcycle. To train detectors even better, however, we need to keep subjecting them to confusing or deceitful adversarial patches as we probe for the models' blind spots. For such probes, we came up with a novel approach, a Low-Detectable Adversarial Patch, which attacks an object detector with small and texture-consistent adversarial patches, making these adversaries less likely to be recognized. Concretely, we use several geometric primitives to model the shapes and positions of the patches. To enhance our attack performance, we also assign different weights to the bounding boxes in terms of loss function. Our experiments on the common detection dataset COCO as well as the driving-video dataset D2-City show that LDAP is an effective attack method, and can resist the adversarial patch detector.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Sep 2021.
Builds on
28 of 33 references.
References · 28
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
- 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,177
- 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,639
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,277
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2016Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detectioncited by 5,036
- 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,852
- 2015SSD: Single Shot MultiBox Detectorcited by 3,130
- 2015Fast R-CNNcited by 2,933
16 more
- 2018YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvementcited by 2,659
- 2013Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentationcited by 2,162
- 2020YOLOv4: Optimal Speed and Accuracy of Object Detectioncited by 1,630
- 2016YOLO9000: Better, Faster, Strongercited by 1,431
- 2019MMDetection: Open MMLab Detection Toolbox and Benchmarkcited by 1,385
- 2015DeepFool: a simple and accurate method to fool deep neural networkscited by 1,318
- 2018Threat of Adversarial Attacks on Deep Learning in Computer Vision: A Surveycited by 460
- 2017Adversarial Examples for Semantic Segmentation and Object Detectioncited by 275
- 2019Fooling automated surveillance cameras: adversarial patches to attack person detectioncited by 268
- 2013OverFeat: Integrated Recognition, Localization and Detection using Convolutional Networkscited by 224
- 2018Physical Adversarial Examples for Object Detectorscited by 163
- 2019Making an Invisibility Cloak: Real World Adversarial Attacks on Object Detectorscited by 155
- 2018DPatch: An Adversarial Patch Attack on Object Detectorscited by 147
- 2018Transferable Adversarial Attacks for Image and Video Object Detectioncited by 109
- 2019Universal Physical Camouflage Attacks on Object Detectorscited by 91
- 2020Pick-Object-Attack: Type-Specific Adversarial Attack for Object Detectioncited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 6.
8 papers.
- 2024Effectiveness Assessment of Recent Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 29
- 2022A Survey on Physical Adversarial Attack in Computer Visioncited by 25
- 2024Object Detectors in the Open Environment: Challenges, Solutions, and Outlookcited by 13
- 2024Environmental Matching Attack Against Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Object Detectioncited by 11
- 2024I Don't Know You, But I Can Catch You: Real-Time Defense against Diverse Adversarial Patches for Object Detectorscited by 5
- 2023X-Detect: Explainable Adversarial Patch Detection for Object Detectors in Retailcited by 1
- 2024DePatch: Towards Robust Adversarial Patch for Evading Person Detectors in the Real Worldcited by 1
- 2024Patch is Enough: Naturalistic Adversarial Patch against Vision-Language Pre-training Modelscited by 0
- 2024Patch is Enough: Naturalistic Adversarial Patch against Vision-Language Pre-training Models7 Oct 2024
- 2024DePatch: Towards Robust Adversarial Patch for Evading Person Detectors in the Real World13 Aug 2024
- 2024I Don't Know You, But I Can Catch You: Real-Time Defense against Diverse Adversarial Patches for Object Detectors12 Jun 2024
- 2024Environmental Matching Attack Against Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Object Detection13 May 2024
- 2024Object Detectors in the Open Environment: Challenges, Solutions, and Outlook24 Mar 2024
- 2024Effectiveness Assessment of Recent Large Vision-Language Models7 Mar 2024
- 2023X-Detect: Explainable Adversarial Patch Detection for Object Detectors in Retail14 Jun 2023
- 2022A Survey on Physical Adversarial Attack in Computer Vision28 Sep 2022