Think before you act: A simple baseline for compositional generalization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Contrarily to humans who have the ability to recombine familiar expressions to create novel ones, modern neural networks struggle to do so. This has been emphasized recently with the introduction of the benchmark dataset "gSCAN" (Ruis et al. 2020), aiming to evaluate models' performance at compositional generalization in grounded language understanding. In this work, we challenge the gSCAN benchmark by proposing a simple model that achieves surprisingly good performance on two of the gSCAN test splits. Our model is based on the observation that, to succeed on gSCAN tasks, the agent must (i) identify the target object (think) before (ii) navigating to it successfully (act). Concretely, we propose an attention-inspired modification of the baseline model from (Ruis et al. 2020), together with an auxiliary loss, that takes into account the sequential nature of steps (i) and (ii). While two compositional tasks are trivially solved with our approach, we also find that the other tasks remain unsolved, validating the relevance of gSCAN as a benchmark for evaluating models' compositional abilities.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 5; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
11 papers.
- 2021Improving Coherence and Consistency in Neural Sequence Models with Dual-System, Neuro-Symbolic Reasoningcited by 85
- 2021ReaSCAN: Compositional Reasoning in Language Groundingcited by 19
- 2021Systematic Generalization on gSCAN: What is Nearly Solved and What is Next?cited by 15
- 2022Improving Systematic Generalization Through Modularity and Augmentationcited by 13
- 2022When Can Transformers Ground and Compose: Insights from Compositional Generalization Benchmarkscited by 11
- 2022Compositional Generalization in Grounded Language Learning via Induced Model Sparsitycited by 4
- 2022Recursive Decoding: A Situated Cognition Approach to Compositional Generation in Grounded Language Understandingcited by 3
- 2023Is Feedback All You Need? Leveraging Natural Language Feedback in Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learningcited by 2
- 2023Compositional Generalization in Spoken Language Understandingcited by 1
- 2022A Short Survey of Systematic Generalizationcited by 0
- 2025Data Distributional Properties As Inductive Bias for Systematic Generalizationcited by 0
- 2025Data Distributional Properties As Inductive Bias for Systematic Generalization27 Feb 2025
- 2023Compositional Generalization in Spoken Language Understanding25 Dec 2023
- 2023Is Feedback All You Need? Leveraging Natural Language Feedback in Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learning7 Dec 2023
- 2022A Short Survey of Systematic Generalization22 Nov 2022
- 2022When Can Transformers Ground and Compose: Insights from Compositional Generalization Benchmarks23 Oct 2022
- 2022Compositional Generalization in Grounded Language Learning via Induced Model Sparsity6 Jul 2022
- 2022Improving Systematic Generalization Through Modularity and Augmentation22 Feb 2022
- 2022Recursive Decoding: A Situated Cognition Approach to Compositional Generation in Grounded Language Understanding27 Jan 2022
- 2021Systematic Generalization on gSCAN: What is Nearly Solved and What is Next?25 Sep 2021
- 2021ReaSCAN: Compositional Reasoning in Language Grounding18 Sep 2021
- 2021Improving Coherence and Consistency in Neural Sequence Models with Dual-System, Neuro-Symbolic Reasoning6 Jul 2021