mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Compositional Networks Enable Systematic Generalization for Grounded Language Understanding

arXiv 2008.02742 ↗First posted 6 Aug 2020cs.CL cs.AI cs.ROcited by 18

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Humans are remarkably flexible when understanding new sentences that include combinations of concepts they have never encountered before. Recent work has shown that while deep networks can mimic some human language abilities when presented with novel sentences, systematic variation uncovers the limitations in the language-understanding abilities of networks. We demonstrate that these limitations can be overcome by addressing the generalization challenges in the gSCAN dataset, which explicitly measures how well an agent is able to interpret novel linguistic commands grounded in vision, e.g., novel pairings of adjectives and nouns. The key principle we employ is compositionality: that the compositional structure of networks should reflect the compositional structure of the problem domain they address, while allowing other parameters to be learned end-to-end. We build a general-purpose mechanism that enables agents to generalize their language understanding to compositional domains. Crucially, our network has the same state-of-the-art performance as prior work while generalizing its knowledge when prior work does not. Our network also provides a level of interpretability that enables users to inspect what each part of networks learns. Robust grounded language understanding without dramatic failures and without corner cases is critical to building safe and fair robots; we demonstrate the significant role that compositionality can play in achieving that goal.

Key facts. Cited by 18 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 6 Aug 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 6; 2023: 3; 2024: 3; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

18 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2023Do Embodied Agents Dream of Pixelated Sheep: Embodied Decision Making using Language Guided World Modellingcited by 88
  2. 2022Reconstructing Action-Conditioned Human-Object Interactions Using Commonsense Knowledge Priorscited by 30
  3. 2021Systematic Generalization on gSCAN: What is Nearly Solved and What is Next?cited by 15
  4. 2024A Survey on Compositional Learning of AI Models: Theoretical and Experimental Practicescited by 15
  5. 2022Improving Systematic Generalization Through Modularity and Augmentationcited by 13
  6. 2024Learning to Compose: Improving Object Centric Learning by Injecting Compositionalitycited by 13
  7. 2022When Can Transformers Ground and Compose: Insights from Compositional Generalization Benchmarkscited by 11
  8. 2024Understanding Simplicity Bias towards Compositional Mappings via Learning Dynamicscited by 5
  9. 2022Compositional Generalization in Grounded Language Learning via Induced Model Sparsitycited by 4
  10. 2022Recursive Decoding: A Situated Cognition Approach to Compositional Generation in Grounded Language Understandingcited by 3
  11. 2021Bag-of-Vectors Autoencoders for Unsupervised Conditional Text Generationcited by 1
  12. 2023Syntax-Guided Transformers: Elevating Compositional Generalization and Grounding in Multimodal Environmentscited by 1
6 more
  1. 2023Compositional Generalization in Spoken Language Understandingcited by 1
  2. 2025Disentangled Representation Learning via Modular Compositional Biascited by 1
  3. 2022A Short Survey of Systematic Generalizationcited by 0
  4. 2025Data Distributional Properties As Inductive Bias for Systematic Generalizationcited by 0
  5. 2025Independent Density Estimationcited by 0
  6. 2026What Do Current Systematic Generalization Tasks Miss? A Reasoning-Centered Analysiscited by 0