Krylov-Bellman boosting: Super-linear policy evaluation in general state spaces
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We present and analyze the Krylov-Bellman Boosting (KBB) algorithm for policy evaluation in general state spaces. It alternates between fitting the Bellman residual using non-parametric regression (as in boosting), and estimating the value function via the least-squares temporal difference (LSTD) procedure applied with a feature set that grows adaptively over time. By exploiting the connection to Krylov methods, we equip this method with two attractive guarantees. First, we provide a general convergence bound that allows for separate estimation errors in residual fitting and LSTD computation. Consistent with our numerical experiments, this bound shows that convergence rates depend on the restricted spectral structure, and are typically super-linear. Second, by combining this meta-result with sample-size dependent guarantees for residual fitting and LSTD computation, we obtain concrete statistical guarantees that depend on the sample size along with the complexity of the function class used to fit the residuals. We illustrate the behavior of the KBB algorithm for various types of policy evaluation problems, and typically find large reductions in sample complexity relative to the standard approach of fitted value iterationn.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 75 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Oct 2022.
Builds on
14 of 75 references.
References · 14
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
- 2016Asynchronous Methods for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 2,218
- 2017Domain Randomization for Transferring Deep Neural Networks from Simulation to the Real Worldcited by 1,401
- 2015End-to-End Training of Deep Visuomotor Policiescited by 847
- 2014Deep Learning in Neural Networks: An Overviewcited by 765
- 2019Information-Theoretic Considerations in Batch Reinforcement Learningcited by 285
- 2018A Finite Time Analysis of Temporal Difference Learning With Linear Function Approximationcited by 225
- 2019A Theoretical Analysis of Deep Q-Learningcited by 212
- 2020Minimax-Optimal Off-Policy Evaluation with Linear Function Approximationcited by 120
- 2017Scalable trust-region method for deep reinforcement learning using Kronecker-factored approximationcited by 119
- 2020Is Temporal Difference Learning Optimal? An Instance-Dependent Analysiscited by 41
- 2021Optimal policy evaluation using kernel-based temporal difference methodscited by 24
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2.
2 papers.