mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Multi-Task Learning with Sentiment, Emotion, and Target Detection to Recognize Hate Speech and Offensive Language

arXiv 2109.10255 ↗First posted 21 Sep 2021cs.CLcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The recognition of hate speech and offensive language (HOF) is commonly formulated as a classification task to decide if a text contains HOF. We investigate whether HOF detection can profit by taking into account the relationships between HOF and similar concepts: (a) HOF is related to sentiment analysis because hate speech is typically a negative statement and expresses a negative opinion; (b) it is related to emotion analysis, as expressed hate points to the author experiencing (or pretending to experience) anger while the addressees experience (or are intended to experience) fear. (c) Finally, one constituting element of HOF is the mention of a targeted person or group. On this basis, we hypothesize that HOF detection shows improvements when being modeled jointly with these concepts, in a multi-task learning setup. We base our experiments on existing data sets for each of these concepts (sentiment, emotion, target of HOF) and evaluate our models as a participant (as team IMS-SINAI) in the HASOC FIRE 2021 English Subtask 1A. Based on model-selection experiments in which we consider multiple available resources and submissions to the shared task, we find that the combination of the CrowdFlower emotion corpus, the SemEval 2016 Sentiment Corpus, and the OffensEval 2019 target detection data leads to an F1 =.79 in a multi-head multi-task learning model based on BERT, in comparison to .7895 of plain BERT. On the HASOC 2019 test data, this result is more substantial with an increase by 2pp in F1 and a considerable increase in recall. Across both data sets (2019, 2021), the recall is particularly increased for the class of HOF (6pp for the 2019 data and 3pp for the 2021 data), showing that MTL with emotion, sentiment, and target identification is an appropriate approach for early warning systems that might be deployed in social media platforms.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 80 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Sep 2021.

Builds on

25 of 80 references.

References · 25

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  3. 2017A Survey on Multi-Task Learningcited by 838
  4. 2017Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Languagecited by 724
  5. 2017DailyDialog: A Manually Labelled Multi-turn Dialogue Datasetcited by 649
  6. 2019Predicting the Type and Target of Offensive Posts in Social Mediacited by 268
  7. 2020HateCheck: Functional Tests for Hate Speech Detection Modelscited by 215
  8. 2019SemEval-2019 Task 6: Identifying and Categorizing Offensive Language in Social Media (OffensEval)cited by 206
  9. 2017Deep Learning for Hate Speech Detection in Tweetscited by 180
  10. 2020SemEval-2020 Task 12: Multilingual Offensive Language Identification in Social Media (OffensEval 2020)cited by 138
  11. 2019Emotion-Cause Pair Extraction: A New Task to Emotion Analysis in Textscited by 82
  12. 2018Hate Lingo: A Target-based Linguistic Analysis of Hate Speech in Social Mediacited by 59
13 more
  1. 2016Analyzing the Targets of Hate in Online Social Mediacited by 48
  2. 2021Hate Towards the Political Opponent: A Twitter Corpus Study of the 2020 US Elections on the Basis of Offensive Speech and Stance Detectioncited by 45
  3. 2019Multi-task Learning for Multi-modal Emotion Recognition and Sentiment Analysiscited by 39
  4. 2021Overview of the HASOC track at FIRE 2020: Hate Speech and Offensive Content Identification in Indo-European Languagescited by 38
  5. 2017WASSA-2017 Shared Task on Emotion Intensitycited by 37
  6. 2017Emotion Intensities in Tweetscited by 32
  7. 2019SemEval-2016 Task 4: Sentiment Analysis in Twittercited by 14
  8. 2020Joint Modelling of Emotion and Abusive Language Detectioncited by 13
  9. 2020Leveraging Affective Bidirectional Transformers for Offensive Language Detectioncited by 11
  10. 2017Assessing State-of-the-Art Sentiment Models on State-of-the-Art Sentiment Datasetscited by 8
  11. 2020Token Sequence Labeling vs. Clause Classification for English Emotion Stimulus Detectioncited by 8
  12. 2018Transfer Learning from LDA to BiLSTM-CNN for Offensive Language Detection in Twittercited by 6
  13. 2021Emotion Stimulus Detection in German News Headlinescited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 4; 2023: 3; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

12 papers.