Same Same, But Different: Conditional Multi-Task Learning for Demographic-Specific Toxicity Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Algorithmic bias often arises as a result of differential subgroup validity, in which predictive relationships vary across groups. For example, in toxic language detection, comments targeting different demographic groups can vary markedly across groups. In such settings, trained models can be dominated by the relationships that best fit the majority group, leading to disparate performance. We propose framing toxicity detection as multi-task learning (MTL), allowing a model to specialize on the relationships that are relevant to each demographic group while also leveraging shared properties across groups. With toxicity detection, each task corresponds to identifying toxicity against a particular demographic group. However, traditional MTL requires labels for all tasks to be present for every data point. To address this, we propose Conditional MTL (CondMTL), wherein only training examples relevant to the given demographic group are considered by the loss function. This lets us learn group specific representations in each branch which are not cross contaminated by irrelevant labels. Results on synthetic and real data show that using CondMTL improves predictive recall over various baselines in general and for the minority demographic group in particular, while having similar overall accuracy.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Feb 2023.
Builds on
29 of 58 references.
References · 29
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,243
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
- 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,366
- 2017Multi-Task Learning Using Uncertainty to Weigh Losses for Scene Geometry and Semanticscited by 1,345
- 2017GradNorm: Gradient Normalization for Adaptive Loss Balancing in Deep Multitask Networkscited by 816
- 2017An Overview of Multi-Task Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 791
- 2017Focal Loss for Dense Object Detectioncited by 749
- 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
- 2018End-to-End Multi-Task Learning with Attentioncited by 533
- 2016Cross-stitch Networks for Multi-task Learningcited by 466
- 2019Nuanced Metrics for Measuring Unintended Bias with Real Data for Text Classificationcited by 396
17 more
- 2020Multi-Task Learning with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 374
- 2020HateCheck: Functional Tests for Hate Speech Detection Modelscited by 215
- 2016UberNet: Training a `Universal' Convolutional Neural Network for Low-, Mid-, and High-Level Vision using Diverse Datasets and Limited Memorycited by 200
- 2018Reducing Gender Bias in Abusive Language Detectioncited by 152
- 2018NDDR-CNN: Layerwise Feature Fusing in Multi-Task CNNs by Neural Discriminative Dimensionality Reductioncited by 127
- 2022Jury Learning: Integrating Dissenting Voices into Machine Learning Modelscited by 115
- 2020FairBatch: Batch Selection for Model Fairnesscited by 99
- 2016Fully-adaptive Feature Sharing in Multi-Task Networks with Applications in Person Attribute Classificationcited by 93
- 2016Deep Multi-task Representation Learning: A Tensor Factorisation Approachcited by 69
- 2016A Joint Many-Task Model: Growing a Neural Network for Multiple NLP Taskscited by 62
- 2019Many Task Learning with Task Routingcited by 50
- 2022Optimising Equal Opportunity Fairness in Model Trainingcited by 22
- 2021AngryBERT: Joint Learning Target and Emotion for Hate Speech Detectioncited by 19
- 2019It Takes Nine to Smell a Rat: Neural Multi-Task Learning for Check-Worthiness Predictioncited by 14
- 2021Multi-Task Learning with Sentiment, Emotion, and Target Detection to Recognize Hate Speech and Offensive Languagecited by 12
- 2022Exploiting Transformer-based Multitask Learning for the Detection of Media Bias in News Articlescited by 11
- 2021WLV-RIT at GermEval 2021: Multitask Learning with Transformers to Detect Toxic, Engaging, and Fact-Claiming Commentscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 4; 2024: 5; 2025: 1.
10 papers.
- 2023Sensitivity, Performance, Robustness: Deconstructing the Effect of Sociodemographic Promptingcited by 80
- 2023A Critical Survey on Fairness Benefits of Explainable AIcited by 16
- 2023Human-centered NLP Fact-checking: Co-Designing with Fact-checkers using Matchmaking for AIcited by 9
- 2024Voices in a Crowd: Searching for Clusters of Unique Perspectivescited by 9
- 2024Hate Speech Detection with Generalizable Target-aware Fairnesscited by 7
- 2024Algorithmic Fairness: A Tolerance Perspectivecited by 2
- 2023Mitigating Label Bias via Decoupled Confident Learningcited by 1
- 2024Mapping the Potential of Explainable AI for Fairness Along the AI Lifecyclecited by 1
- 2024Fairness-Aware Multi-Group Target Detection in Online Discussioncited by 1
- 2025Bias-Aware Mislabeling Detection via Decoupled Confident Learningcited by 0
- 2025Bias-Aware Mislabeling Detection via Decoupled Confident Learning9 Jul 2025
- 2024Voices in a Crowd: Searching for Clusters of Unique Perspectives19 Jul 2024
- 2024Fairness-Aware Multi-Group Target Detection in Online Discussion16 Jul 2024
- 2024Hate Speech Detection with Generalizable Target-aware Fairness28 May 2024
- 2024Mapping the Potential of Explainable AI for Fairness Along the AI Lifecycle29 Apr 2024
- 2024Algorithmic Fairness: A Tolerance Perspective26 Apr 2024
- 2023A Critical Survey on Fairness Benefits of Explainable AI15 Oct 2023
- 2023Sensitivity, Performance, Robustness: Deconstructing the Effect of Sociodemographic Prompting13 Sep 2023
- 2023Human-centered NLP Fact-checking: Co-Designing with Fact-checkers using Matchmaking for AI14 Aug 2023
- 2023Mitigating Label Bias via Decoupled Confident Learning18 Jul 2023