Language Models That Walk the Talk: A Framework for Formal Fairness Certificates
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As large language models become integral to high-stakes applications, ensuring their robustness and fairness is critical. Despite their success, large language models remain vulnerable to adversarial attacks, where small perturbations, such as synonym substitutions, can alter model predictions, posing risks in fairness-critical areas, such as gender bias mitigation, and safety-critical areas, such as toxicity detection. While formal verification has been explored for neural networks, its application to large language models remains limited. This work presents a holistic verification framework to certify the robustness of transformer-based language models, with a focus on ensuring gender fairness and consistent outputs across different gender-related terms. Furthermore, we extend this methodology to toxicity detection, offering formal guarantees that adversarially manipulated toxic inputs are consistently detected and appropriately censored, thereby ensuring the reliability of moderation systems. By formalizing robustness within the embedding space, this work strengthens the reliability of language models in ethical AI deployment and content moderation.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 101 of its 157 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 May 2025.
Builds on
101 of 157 references.
References · 101
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
- 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,513
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
- 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,375
- 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,241
- 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,148
- 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,474
38 more
- 2020Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features by Contrasting Cluster Assignmentscited by 2,857
- 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,829
- 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,330
- 2018Deep contextualized word representationscited by 2,290
- 2020Improved Baselines with Momentum Contrastive Learningcited by 2,287
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
- 2020Big Self-Supervised Models are Strong Semi-Supervised Learnerscited by 1,380
- 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,312
- 2020RealToxicityPrompts: Evaluating Neural Toxic Degeneration in Language Modelscited by 1,255
- 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Transfer Learningcited by 1,160
- 2023Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluatorscited by 1,085
- 2020StereoSet: Measuring stereotypical bias in pretrained language modelscited by 924
- 2016Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biasescited by 901
- 2019EDA: Easy Data Augmentation Techniques for Boosting Performance on Text Classification Taskscited by 807
- 2017Reluplex: An Efficient SMT Solver for Verifying Deep Neural Networkscited by 744
- 2017Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Languagecited by 736
- 2019Is BERT Really Robust? A Strong Baseline for Natural Language Attack on Text Classification and Entailmentcited by 671
- 2023Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 639
- 2020A Survey on Contrastive Self-supervised Learningcited by 554
- 2019A Theoretical Analysis of Contrastive Unsupervised Representation Learningcited by 530
- 2018Efficient Neural Network Robustness Certification with General Activation Functionscited by 445
- 2019TabFact: A Large-scale Dataset for Table-based Fact Verificationcited by 428
- 2018Generating Natural Language Adversarial Examplescited by 424
- 2021BOLD: Dataset and Metrics for Measuring Biases in Open-Ended Language Generationcited by 412
- 2020Understanding the Behaviour of Contrastive Losscited by 398
- 2018TextBugger: Generating Adversarial Text Against Real-world Applicationscited by 381
- 2021Persistent Anti-Muslim Bias in Large Language Modelscited by 377
- 2020Keystroke Dynamics as Part of Lifeloggingcited by 334
- 2021Provable Guarantees for Self-Supervised Deep Learning with Spectral Contrastive Losscited by 313
- 2021Recent Advances in Adversarial Training for Adversarial Robustnesscited by 279
- 2019Measuring Bias in Contextualized Word Representationscited by 276
- 2023Certifying LLM Safety against Adversarial Promptingcited by 266
- 2016Safety Verification of Deep Neural Networkscited by 263
- 2020Fairness without Demographics through Adversarially Reweighted Learningcited by 251
- 2021Beta-CROWN: Efficient Bound Propagation with Per-neuron Split Constraints for Complete and Incomplete Neural Network Robustness Verificationcited by 228
- 2020Measuring and Reducing Gendered Correlations in Pre-trained Modelscited by 224
- 2019Identifying and Reducing Gender Bias in Word-Level Language Modelscited by 214
50 most cited of 101 All 101 (JSON)
Built on by
Not cited yet.