mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Language Models That Walk the Talk: A Framework for Formal Fairness Certificates

arXiv 2505.12767 ↗First posted 19 May 2025cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As large language models become integral to high-stakes applications, ensuring their robustness and fairness is critical. Despite their success, large language models remain vulnerable to adversarial attacks, where small perturbations, such as synonym substitutions, can alter model predictions, posing risks in fairness-critical areas, such as gender bias mitigation, and safety-critical areas, such as toxicity detection. While formal verification has been explored for neural networks, its application to large language models remains limited. This work presents a holistic verification framework to certify the robustness of transformer-based language models, with a focus on ensuring gender fairness and consistent outputs across different gender-related terms. Furthermore, we extend this methodology to toxicity detection, offering formal guarantees that adversarially manipulated toxic inputs are consistently detected and appropriately censored, thereby ensuring the reliability of moderation systems. By formalizing robustness within the embedding space, this work strengthens the reliability of language models in ethical AI deployment and content moderation.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 101 of its 157 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 May 2025.

Builds on

101 of 157 references.

References · 101

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  3. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  4. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  5. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  6. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,513
  7. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  8. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
  9. 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,375
  10. 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,241
  11. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,148
  12. 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,474
38 more
  1. 2020Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features by Contrasting Cluster Assignmentscited by 2,857
  2. 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,829
  3. 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,330
  4. 2018Deep contextualized word representationscited by 2,290
  5. 2020Improved Baselines with Momentum Contrastive Learningcited by 2,287
  6. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
  7. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
  8. 2020Big Self-Supervised Models are Strong Semi-Supervised Learnerscited by 1,380
  9. 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,312
  10. 2020RealToxicityPrompts: Evaluating Neural Toxic Degeneration in Language Modelscited by 1,255
  11. 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Transfer Learningcited by 1,160
  12. 2023Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluatorscited by 1,085
  13. 2020StereoSet: Measuring stereotypical bias in pretrained language modelscited by 924
  14. 2016Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biasescited by 901
  15. 2019EDA: Easy Data Augmentation Techniques for Boosting Performance on Text Classification Taskscited by 807
  16. 2017Reluplex: An Efficient SMT Solver for Verifying Deep Neural Networkscited by 744
  17. 2017Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Languagecited by 736
  18. 2019Is BERT Really Robust? A Strong Baseline for Natural Language Attack on Text Classification and Entailmentcited by 671
  19. 2023Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 639
  20. 2020A Survey on Contrastive Self-supervised Learningcited by 554
  21. 2019A Theoretical Analysis of Contrastive Unsupervised Representation Learningcited by 530
  22. 2018Efficient Neural Network Robustness Certification with General Activation Functionscited by 445
  23. 2019TabFact: A Large-scale Dataset for Table-based Fact Verificationcited by 428
  24. 2018Generating Natural Language Adversarial Examplescited by 424
  25. 2021BOLD: Dataset and Metrics for Measuring Biases in Open-Ended Language Generationcited by 412
  26. 2020Understanding the Behaviour of Contrastive Losscited by 398
  27. 2018TextBugger: Generating Adversarial Text Against Real-world Applicationscited by 381
  28. 2021Persistent Anti-Muslim Bias in Large Language Modelscited by 377
  29. 2020Keystroke Dynamics as Part of Lifeloggingcited by 334
  30. 2021Provable Guarantees for Self-Supervised Deep Learning with Spectral Contrastive Losscited by 313
  31. 2021Recent Advances in Adversarial Training for Adversarial Robustnesscited by 279
  32. 2019Measuring Bias in Contextualized Word Representationscited by 276
  33. 2023Certifying LLM Safety against Adversarial Promptingcited by 266
  34. 2016Safety Verification of Deep Neural Networkscited by 263
  35. 2020Fairness without Demographics through Adversarially Reweighted Learningcited by 251
  36. 2021Beta-CROWN: Efficient Bound Propagation with Per-neuron Split Constraints for Complete and Incomplete Neural Network Robustness Verificationcited by 228
  37. 2020Measuring and Reducing Gendered Correlations in Pre-trained Modelscited by 224
  38. 2019Identifying and Reducing Gender Bias in Word-Level Language Modelscited by 214

50 most cited of 101 All 101 (JSON)

Built on by

Not cited yet.